Gerald Carey Garwood v. Stanley Sniff et al

Filing 22

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, by Judge David O. Carter 21 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2. The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED; See document for further information. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 GERALD CAREY GARWOOD, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 STANLEY SNIFF, JR., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 17-1759-DOC (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, 20 including the operative “Amended Petition,” the Motion to Dismiss filed by 21 defendants the County of Riverside and Stanley Sniff, Jr. (Dkt. 13), to which 22 no opposition was filed, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned 23 United States Magistrate Judge. No party has filed timely written objections to 24 the Report and Recommendation nor timely requested additional time in 25 which to do so. 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 28 2. The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED; 1 2 3 3. Plaintiff’s “Amended Petition” is dismissed as to all defendants without leave to amend and with prejudice; and 5. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. 4 5 Dated: February 13, 2018 6 ______________________________ DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?