Josette Bastien v. 10-00020 Services, Inc.

Filing 37

FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ("75,000"). Post-judgment interest shall accrue on this amount pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 beginning September 1, 2018. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 35 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JAMES M. SHORE (SB #135945)
[e-mail]
BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346)
[e-mail]
STOEL RIVES LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6
DEC 17, 2018
B
H

Attorneys for Defendant
10-20 SERVICES, INC., A NEVADA
CORPORATION

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EASTERN DIVISION

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-01864-VAP-SHK

JOSETTE BASTIEN, individually,

[PROPOSED] FINAL
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION

v.
10-20 SERVICES, INC., A NEVADA
CORPORATION; and Does 1 through
30, inclusive,

Action Filed:

August 7, 2017

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

SACRAMENTO

99494921.1 0059106-00003

1

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

2

Plaintiff Josette Bastien (“Plaintiff”) has commenced this action against

3

Defendant 10-20 Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendants will be

4

referred to collectively as the “Parties”) alleging claims for unpaid wages and

5

wrongful termination. The Parties have agreed to the entry of this Final Judgment

6

Pursuant to Stipulation (“Judgment”) to resolve all matters in dispute in this action

7

without the completion of trial or the adjudication of any issues of law or fact. This

8

Judgment shall not constitute evidence or admission of fault or concession of

9

liability or wrongdoing by Defendant regarding any allegations of law or fact,

10

alleged either expressly or impliedly, in the Complaint.

11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment

12

is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of SEVENTY-

13

FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS (“$75,000”). Post-judgment

14

interest shall accrue on this amount pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 beginning

15

September 1, 2018.

16
17
18

DATED: December 17, 2018 __________________
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS,
Chief United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

SACRAMENTO

99494921.1 0059106-00003