Christopher Cullins et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 33

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. against plaintiffs Christopher Cullins, Sarah Cullins. Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant Wells Fargo; and As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions to tax costs and for attorneys' fees. (mrgo)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

CHRISTOPHER CULLINS, an
individual; SARAH CULLINS, an
individual,

13

[The Honorable S. George H. Wu]

15

17
18

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs,

14

16

CASE NO.: EDCV 17-1883-GW(SPx)

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
CLEAR RECON CORPORATION;
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

19

Defendants

20
21
22
On March 12, 2018, the Court issued an Order (Doc. No. 31) granting,

23

24 without leave to amend, the Motion of Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
25 (successor by merger with Wells Fargo Bank, Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia
26 Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB) (“Wells Fargo”) to Dismiss the
27 Second Amended Complaint.
28 / / /
93000/FR2386/01996724-1

1

CASE NO.: EDCV 17-1883-GW(SPX)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

1

Accordingly:

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

3

1.

The Second Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice;

4

2.

Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo and against

5 plaintiffs Christopher Cullins and Sarah Cullins on the Second Amended
6 Complaint and all causes of action alleged therein;
7

3.

Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant

8 Wells Fargo; and
9

4.

As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions

10 to tax costs and for attorneys’ fees.
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13 DATED: March 26, 2018
GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2386/01996724-1

2

CASE NO.: EDCV 17-1883-GW(SPX)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to
this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address
3
is 301 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1100, Pasadena, California 91101-4158.
4
On March 13, 2018, I served the foregoing document entitled:
5
2

6
7

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

8 on the interested parties in said case as follows:
9

Served Electronically Via The Court’s CM/ECF System:

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
Patricia Rodriguez, Esq.
RODRIGUEZ LAW GROUP, INC.
1492 W. Colorado Blvd., Suite 120
Pasadena, CA 91105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

18

Attorneys for Defendant
Clear Recon Corp.:
Genail M. Anderson, Esq.
Casper J. Rankin, Esq.
ALDRIDGE | PITE, LLP
4375 Jutland Drive
San Diego, CA 92117
Direct Dial: [phone]
Direct Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
23 America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the
office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was
24 made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California, on March 13, 2018.
25
26

Jill Ashley
27 (Type or Print Name)

/s/ Jill Ashley
(Signature of Declarant)

28
93000/FR2386/01996724-1

CASE NO.: EDCV 17-1883-GW(SPX)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE