Keith A. Pepito v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al

Filing 24

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss With Prejudice 23 : (see document image for specifics). IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. (ad)

1
2

l

3
O

4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

is

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION

11'
12 KEITH A.PEPITO,
Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
et al.,
16
Defendants.
17

CASE NO. 5:17-CV-02128-DSF(SPx)
ORDER GRANTING
~PTIPULATI~N TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
Trial Date:

None Set

18
19

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND THE PARTIES HAVING

20 STIPULATED THERETO,YT IS ORDERED,ADNDGED AND DECREED:
21

L

The Complaint, in its entirety and as to each and every claim for relief

22 and any and all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice.
2
3

2
.

The settlement is further memorialized in a written settlement

24 agreement.
25

3.

The parties shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees

26 arising out of and/or connected with this matter, including any such fees or expenses
27 potentially recoverable under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988.
2
8

///
4825-3778-8767.i

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRAt~3T[1v`G STIPULATfON TO DISMISS WITH PREJU€}iCE

1

4.

This Order is the resul# of a compromise of disputed claim. It is not to

2 be considered as an admission of liability and/or responsibility with regard to the
3 incident, occurrence, casualty or event referenced in the pleadings herein.
4

5.

The parties agree that the mediator shall retain jurisdiction for the

5 pwpose ofenforcement of the terms of the settlement agreement between the
6 parties.
7

IT IS SO ORDERED,ADJUDGED AND DECREED.

8
9 DATED: April ~Z , 2018
10
11

Hon. Sheri Pym
United States Magistrate Judge

~z
i3
14
15

is
17
18
19
2
0
Z1
22
23
2
4
25
2
6
27
2
$
as2s-3~~s-s~6~,i

2
[
PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PFtEJUD10E