Dean Himbler Aviles et al v. California Highway Patrol et al

Filing 2

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The Court previously received from plaintiff a complaint without an accompany IFP Request, and without payment of the filing fees. The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiff advising that failure t o correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficienry has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ab)

Download PDF
D~ ,- 6 201 OF CALIFORNIA DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dean Nimbler Aviles and Nimbler Investments Organization CASE NUMBER ~ 5:17-cv-02161-UA Plaintiffs)/Petitioner(s) V . California Highway Patrol, Rancho Cucamonga Police ORDER OF DISMISSAL Department, and The People of the State of California Defendant(s). The Court previously received from Plaintiffs)/Petitioner(s): an IFP Request or financial information with no accompanying Complaint or Petition. a Complaint or Petition without an accompanying IFP Request, and without payment of the filing fees. ~ a Complaint with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the required $400. The Court sent a warning letter to Plaintiffs)/Petitioner(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficienry has not been corrected. Accordingly, this case is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. IT IS SO ORDERED. -~ Dated: ~~~, ~~ _ ` . ~/L~ Chief United States District Judge ORDER OF DISMISSAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?