The Hays Group, Inc. v. Arlene Campos

Filing 31

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: This Court having granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on 3/15/2018 30 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff The Hays Group, In c. and against Defendant Arlene Campos on Plaintiff's causes of action for declaratory and injunctive relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: (1) The American Arbitration Association is the exclusive forum for Defendant to raise her employment-relat ed claims against Plaintiff, pursuant to the terms of the parties' Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement. Accordingly, the JAMS arbitration forum has no jurisdiction over the dispute. The foregoing is a judicial declaration issued pursu ant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2201 et seq. and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq. (2) Defendant is permanently enjoined from participating in the JAMS arbitration styled Arlene Campos v. The Hays Companies (JAMS Reference No. 1200053683). (3) This Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Judgment. The Order to Show Cause dated 3/8/2018 is discharged 28 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE HAYS GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 15 ARLENE CAMPOS, 16 Defendant. 17 ) ) Case No.: ED CV 17-2272-DMG (SHKx) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 This Court having granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on March 15, 2018, 21 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in 22 favor of Plaintiff The Hays Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant Arlene 23 Campos (“Defendant”) on Plaintiff’s causes of action for declaratory and injunctive 24 relief. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 26 1. 27 The American Arbitration Association is the exclusive forum for Defendant to raise her employment-related claims against Plaintiff, pursuant to the 28 -1- 1 terms of the parties’ Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement. 2 Accordingly, the JAMS arbitration forum has no jurisdiction over the 3 dispute. 4 Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. and the Federal 5 Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. 6 2. The foregoing is a judicial declaration issued pursuant to the Defendant is permanently enjoined from participating in the JAMS 7 arbitration styled Arlene Campos v. The Hays Companies (JAMS Reference 8 No. 1200053683). 9 3. This Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of 10 implementing and enforcing this Judgment. The Order to Show Cause dated 11 March 8, 2018 is discharged. [Doc. # 28.] 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: March 15, 2018 15 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?