The Hays Group, Inc. v. Arlene Campos
Filing
31
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: This Court having granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on 3/15/2018 30 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff The Hays Group, In c. and against Defendant Arlene Campos on Plaintiff's causes of action for declaratory and injunctive relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: (1) The American Arbitration Association is the exclusive forum for Defendant to raise her employment-relat ed claims against Plaintiff, pursuant to the terms of the parties' Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement. Accordingly, the JAMS arbitration forum has no jurisdiction over the dispute. The foregoing is a judicial declaration issued pursu ant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2201 et seq. and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq. (2) Defendant is permanently enjoined from participating in the JAMS arbitration styled Arlene Campos v. The Hays Companies (JAMS Reference No. 1200053683). (3) This Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of implementing and enforcing this Judgment. The Order to Show Cause dated 3/8/2018 is discharged 28 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THE HAYS GROUP, INC.,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
15
ARLENE CAMPOS,
16
Defendant.
17
)
) Case No.: ED CV 17-2272-DMG (SHKx)
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
This Court having granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment on March 15, 2018,
21
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in
22
favor of Plaintiff The Hays Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant Arlene
23
Campos (“Defendant”) on Plaintiff’s causes of action for declaratory and injunctive
24
relief.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
The American Arbitration Association is the exclusive forum for Defendant
to raise her employment-related claims against Plaintiff, pursuant to the
28
-1-
1
terms of the parties’ Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement.
2
Accordingly, the JAMS arbitration forum has no jurisdiction over the
3
dispute.
4
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. and the Federal
5
Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
6
2.
The foregoing is a judicial declaration issued pursuant to the
Defendant is permanently enjoined from participating in the JAMS
7
arbitration styled Arlene Campos v. The Hays Companies (JAMS Reference
8
No. 1200053683).
9
3.
This Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of
10
implementing and enforcing this Judgment. The Order to Show Cause dated
11
March 8, 2018 is discharged. [Doc. # 28.]
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: March 15, 2018
15
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?