Linda G. Carpenter v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
18
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency, 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
1 NICOLA T. HANNA
United States Attorney
2 DAVID M. HARRIS
3 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
4 CEDINA M. KIM
5 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
6 MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969
7 Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
8
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
9
Telephone: (415) 977-8928
10
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Marla.Letellier@ssa.gov
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
JS-6
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16 LINDA G. CARPENTER,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
No. 5:18-cv-00085-CAS(PLA)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF REMAND
20 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
21 Commissioner of Social Security,
22
Defendant.
23
24
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
25 Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation
26 to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY
27 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is
28 / / /
1
2
remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings
consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand.
3
4
5 DATED: June 11, 2018
HON. CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Judgment of Remand
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?