Linda G. Carpenter v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 18

JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency, 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Download PDF
1 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney 2 DAVID M. HARRIS 3 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division 4 CEDINA M. KIM 5 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, General Civil Section 6 MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969 7 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 8 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 9 Telephone: (415) 977-8928 10 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Marla.Letellier@ssa.gov 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 JS-6 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 LINDA G. CARPENTER, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 No. 5:18-cv-00085-CAS(PLA) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF REMAND 20 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 21 Commissioner of Social Security, 22 Defendant. 23 24 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 25 Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation 26 to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is 28 / / / 1 2 remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. 3 4 5 DATED: June 11, 2018 HON. CHRISTINA A. SNYDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Judgment of Remand 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?