Joseph DeMatteo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 20

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/3/2018. (dc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. EDCV 18-00469-GW (SHK) Date: September 26, 2018 Title: Joseph DeMatteo v. Nancy A. Berryhill Present: The Honorable Shashi H. Kewalramani, United States Magistrate Judge D. Castellanos Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On September 13, 2018, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) as to why Plaintiff has not submitted his settlement proposal to Defendant as required by the Court’s Case Management Order (“CMO”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 7, CMO; ECF No. 19, OSC. Plaintiff was ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than September 24, 2018, as to why he had not complied with the Court’s CMO. Id. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s OSC. The Court notes that it has prodded Plaintiff through this litigation twice before when Plaintiff failed to comply with Court’s CMO on two other occasions. ECF Nos. 8, 14, Orders. Nevertheless, Plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to comply with the Court’s CMO, and most recent OSC that was issued on September 13, 2018, by filing a notice with the Court, no later than October 3, 2018, stating that he has sent Defendant his settlement proposal and is, therefore, in compliance with the Court’s CMO and most recent OSC. Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this OSC as ordered, and within the time specified, will result in dismissal of this action, without prejudice, for failure to comply with the Court’s order, and for want of prosecution under Local Rule 41-5. IT IS SO ORDERED Page 1 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk: DC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?