James Rutherford v. AutoZone-La Quinta, CA et al
Filing
23
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #22 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
JAMES RUTHERFORD, an
individual,
14
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
15
Case No.: 5:18-cv-00759-MWF-SHK
v.
16
17
18
19
20
21
AUTOZONE –LA QUINTA, CA, a
business entity of unknown form;
JANICE B. MORGAN, Trustee of
the JANICE B. MORGAN
REVOCABLE TRUST dated June
23, 1997; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
After consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of the entire action
2
with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford (“Plaintiff”) and Autozone- La
3
Quinta, CA and Janice B. Morgan, Trustee of the Janice B. Morgan Revocable
4
Trust (“Defendants”), the Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of
5
Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall
6
bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 7, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
XXXXXXXXXXX
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?