James Rutherford v. AutoZone-La Quinta, CA et al

Filing 23

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #22 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, 14 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 15 Case No.: 5:18-cv-00759-MWF-SHK v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 AUTOZONE –LA QUINTA, CA, a business entity of unknown form; JANICE B. MORGAN, Trustee of the JANICE B. MORGAN REVOCABLE TRUST dated June 23, 1997; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 After consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of the entire action 2 with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford (“Plaintiff”) and Autozone- La 3 Quinta, CA and Janice B. Morgan, Trustee of the Janice B. Morgan Revocable 4 Trust (“Defendants”), the Court hereby enters a dismissal with prejudice of 5 Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled action, in its entirety. Each party shall 6 bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 7, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER XXXXXXXXXXX DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?