Christopher E. Peck et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filing 19

ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES 17 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER AS FOLLOWS: (1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $1,834.15 to Plai ntiffs and Plaintiffs hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. (2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $1,834.15 to Plaintiffs within 60 days of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the control of Defendant cause delay. (rolm)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12

CHRISTOPHER E. PECK and
CHELSEA POWNEY,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEY’S
FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No.: 5:18-cv-01692-AB-PD

vs.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a
Delaware Corporation; NORTH
COUNTY FORD INC., a California
Corporation dba NORTH COUNTY
FORD; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

Honorable Judge Andre Birotte Jr.

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

26

Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER E. PECK and CHELSEA POWNEY (“Plaintiffs”)

27

and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the

28

Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, have entered into a

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

stipulation for entry of an Order by the Court regarding Plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees, costs

2

and expenses.

3
4

THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:

5

(1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $1,834.15 to Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs

6

hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for

7

attorney’s fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action.

8

(2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $1,834.15 to Plaintiffs within 60 days

9

of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the

10
11

control of Defendant cause delay.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14
15
16

Dated: September 24, 2024

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION