Luis J. Lopez Sarmina et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al.,

Filing 17

ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES 15 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER AS FOLLOWS: (1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Pla intiffs and Plaintiffs hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. (2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs within 60 days of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the control of Defendant cause delay. (rolm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 LUIS J. LOPEZ SARMINA and HERMILA G. HERNANDEZ DE OCHOA, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 5:18-cv-01862-AB-PD [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEY’S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES Plaintiffs, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; DAVID WILSON’S FORD OF ORANGE, INC., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Honorable Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Defendants. 22 23 24 25 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 26 Plaintiffs LUIS J. LOPEZ SARMINA and HERMILA G. HERNANDEZ DE 27 OCHOA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”) 28 (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, have -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION 1 entered into a stipulation for entry of an Order by the Court regarding Plaintiffs’ 2 attorney’s fees, costs and expenses. 3 4 THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 5 (1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs 6 hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for 7 attorney’s fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. 8 (2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs within 60 days 9 of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the 10 11 control of Defendant cause delay. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: September 24, 2024 HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?