Luis J. Lopez Sarmina et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al.,
Filing
17
ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES 15 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER AS FOLLOWS: (1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Pla intiffs and Plaintiffs hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action. (2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs within 60 days of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the control of Defendant cause delay. (rolm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
LUIS J. LOPEZ SARMINA and
HERMILA G. HERNANDEZ DE
OCHOA,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 5:18-cv-01862-AB-PD
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEY’S
FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a
Delaware Corporation; DAVID
WILSON’S FORD OF ORANGE,
INC., a California Corporation; and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Honorable Judge Andre Birotte Jr.
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
26
Plaintiffs LUIS J. LOPEZ SARMINA and HERMILA G. HERNANDEZ DE
27
OCHOA (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”)
28
(collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, have
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
1
entered into a stipulation for entry of an Order by the Court regarding Plaintiffs’
2
attorney’s fees, costs and expenses.
3
4
THE PARTIES HAVE STIPULATED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
5
(1) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs
6
hereby agree to accept said payment in full satisfaction of all claims for
7
attorney’s fees, costs and expenses in connection with this action.
8
(2) That Defendant shall pay the sum of $2,793.01 to Plaintiffs within 60 days
9
of execution of this Stipulation by all counsel unless matters outside of the
10
11
control of Defendant cause delay.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: September 24, 2024
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?