Bryan Madeira v. Converse, Inc. et al

Filing 71

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 65 ) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his complaint against Defendant. 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 70 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) Modified on 1/11/2022 (twdb).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) Case No.: EDCV 19-00154-CJC (SPx) BRYAN MADEIRA, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGMENT ) v. ) ) ) CONVERSE, INC. and DOES 1-50, ) inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) 21 22 23 24 25 In this case, Plaintiff Bryan Madeira claims multiple wage and hour violations against his former employer, Defendant Converse, Inc. (Dkt. 29 [First Amended Complaint].) Defendant moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. Having considered the papers presented, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 26 27 28 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 65) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his complaint against Defendant. -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?