Bryan Madeira v. Converse, Inc. et al
Filing
71
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 65 ) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his complaint against Defendant. 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 70 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) Modified on 1/11/2022 (twdb).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
) Case No.: EDCV 19-00154-CJC (SPx)
BRYAN MADEIRA, on behalf of
)
himself and all others similarly situated, )
)
)
Plaintiff,
) JUDGMENT
)
v.
)
)
)
CONVERSE, INC. and DOES 1-50,
)
inclusive,
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
21
22
23
24
25
In this case, Plaintiff Bryan Madeira claims multiple wage and hour violations
against his former employer, Defendant Converse, Inc. (Dkt. 29 [First Amended
Complaint].) Defendant moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s First Amended
Complaint. Having considered the papers presented, the Court hereby ORDERS that:
26
27
28
1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 65) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his complaint against Defendant.
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?