Daniel Beirne v. Trepco Imports and Distribution Ltd.

Filing 34

JUDGMENT AFTER FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Daniel Beirne against Trepco Imports and Distribution Ltd. The Court approves plaintiff Daniel Beirne as Class Representative, including his enhancemen t award of $5,000. The Court approves the $7,000 Claims Administration Fee to be paid to Simpluris. The Court approves Class Counsels request for Attorneys Fees in the amount of $73,363.75 (25% of the common fund after deducting counsels and Simpluris, Inc.s fees) and $9,545 in Costs. The Court approves the $7,500 LWDA Payment. (twdb)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 11/16/2020 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION 10 10 11 11 12 12 DANIEL BEIRNE, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 5:19-cv-00170-CJC-KKx JUDGMENT AFTER FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TREPCO IMPORTS & DISTRIBUTION, LTD, a Michigan Corporation; and DOES 1 through 250, inclusive, Defendants. 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 On September 16, 2020, the Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiffs’ 23 23 unopposed Motion in Support of Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, 24 24 including Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Motion”). The 25 25 Court considered the Motion papers, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS 26 26 HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT be entered 27 27 by the clerk as follows: 28 28 Page 1 1 1. The Court approves the Settlement memorialized in the Joint 2 Stipulation of Class and Representative Action Settlement and the Notice of Class 3 Action Settlement. 4 5 2. The Court certifies the following Settlement Class for settlement purposes only pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure: 6 (1) all current and/or former non-exempt employees that worked for 7 Trepco in hourly positions from November 13, 2015, and through the 8 date of preliminary approval (July 28, 2020), excluding any persons 9 who opt out. 10 10 3. The Court finds, solely for purposes of the Settlement, that: (a) the 11 11 Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all Settlement Class Members is 12 12 impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement 13 13 Class that predominate over any individual questions; (c) the claims of the Named 14 14 Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class; (d) Named Plaintiffs 15 15 and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of 16 16 the Settlement Class; and (e) a class action is superior to all other available 17 17 methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. The Court 18 18 further finds that the Settlement falls within the range of reasonableness of a 19 19 settlement that could ultimately be granted final approval by the Court, and merits 20 20 submission to Class Members for their consideration. All capitalized terms used 21 21 in this Order shall have the same defined meanings as set forth in the Joint 22 22 Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and Release, unless stated otherwise. 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 4. The Court appoints Brent S. Buchsbaum and Laurel Haag of the Law Offices of Buchsbaum & Haag, LLP, as Class Counsel. 6. The Court approves plaintiff Daniel Beirne as Class Representative, including his enhancement award of $5,000. 7. The Court appoints Simpluris, Inc. as the Claims Administrator. 28 28 Page 2 1 2 3 8. The Court approves the $7,000 Claims Administration Fee to be paid to Simpluris. 9. The Court approves Class Counsel’s request for Attorney’s Fees in 4 the amount of $73,363.75 (25% of the common fund after deducting counsel’s and 5 Simpluris, Inc.’s fees) and $9,545 in Costs. 6 10. The Court approves the $7,500 LWDA Payment. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 10 DATED: November 16, 2020 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 HON. CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?