Rodney Soward v. Moore Advanced, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Having read and considered the parties' stipulation regarding remand to state court 37 , the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff Rodney Soward's motion to remand 32 and ORDERS tha t this action is HEREBY REMANDED to the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Riverside, Case No. RIC1900029. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs in connection with Plaintiff's motion to remand. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) (gk)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

RODNEY SOWARD, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MOORE ADVANCED, INC. d/b/a
“Moore Advanced,” an entity, form
unknown; NFI, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership; and DOES 1 to 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No.: 5:19-CV-00318-AB (SPx)
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REMANDING CASE TO STATE
COURT

Trial Date:
Action filed:

None Set
January 2, 2019

AND RELATED CROSSCLAIM.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT
Case No. 5:19-CV-00318-AB (SPx)

1

Having read and considered the parties’ stipulation regarding remand to state

2

court, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff Rodney Soward’s (“Plaintiff”) motion

3

to remand (Dkt. 32) and ORDERS that this action is HEREBY REMANDED to

4

the Superior Court for the State of California for the County of Riverside. Each

5

party is to bear its own fees and costs in connection with Plaintiff’s motion to

6

remand.

7
8
9

DATED: October 10, 2019
Honorable André Birotte Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT
Case No. 5:19-CV-00318-AB (SPx)