Kimberly Stassin v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 19

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini. 18 It is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioners decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioners request for a n order affirming the Commissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiffs favor and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vmun)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 KIMBERLY STASSIN, 7 Case No. 5:19-CV-00930 (VEB) Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 8 vs. 9 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 10 Defendant. 11 For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED 12 THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED 13 and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner’s request for an order 14 affirming the Commissioner’s final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is 15 entered in Plaintiff’s favor and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with 16 the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys’ fees and costs. 17 DATED this 18th day of November 2020, 18 19 20 /s/Victor E. Bianchini VICTOR E. BIANCHINI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 JUDGMENT – STASSIN v SAUL 5:19-CV-00930-VEB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?