Kimberly Stassin v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
19
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini. 18 It is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioners decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioners request for a n order affirming the Commissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiffs favor and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vmun)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
KIMBERLY STASSIN,
7
Case No. 5:19-CV-00930 (VEB)
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT
8
vs.
9
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social
Security,
10
Defendant.
11
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED
12
THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED
13
and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner’s request for an order
14
affirming the Commissioner’s final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is
15
entered in Plaintiff’s favor and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with
16
the Decision and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for
attorneys’ fees and costs.
17
DATED this 18th day of November 2020,
18
19
20
/s/Victor E. Bianchini
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
JUDGMENT – STASSIN v SAUL 5:19-CV-00930-VEB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?