Arthur Mariscal et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB

Filing 64

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. This Court having granted Defendant Flagstar Bank, FSB's Motion to Dismiss 63 by Order dated September 9, 2021, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs Arthur Mariscal and Catherine Mariscal, whose action is dismissed with prejudice on the merits. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

Case 5:19-cv-02023-DMG-SHK Document 64 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:770

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARTHUR MARISCAL, et al.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB,

16
17
18
19
20

Defendant.

)
) Case No. ED CV 19-2023-DMG (SHKx)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-

Case 5:19-cv-02023-DMG-SHK Document 64 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:771

1
2

This Court having granted Defendant Flagstar Bank, FSB’s Motion to Dismiss by
Order dated September 9, 2021,

3

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor

4

of Defendant and against Plaintiffs Arthur Mariscal and Catherine Mariscal, whose action

5

is dismissed with prejudice on the merits.

6
7

DATED: September 9, 2021

8

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-