David Rogoff v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the pertinent records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted. 2. The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed and the matter isremanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 3. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 4. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. (ch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 DAVID R., 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 17 Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED CV 19-2235-DMG (PLA) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the pertinent 20 records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court 21 accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 23 1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted. 24 2. The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed and the matter is 25 remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 26 / 27 / 28 / 1 3. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 2 4. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. 3 4 5 DATED: February 16, 2021 ______________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?