David Rogoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the pertinent records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted. 2. The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed and the matter isremanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 3. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 4. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
DAVID R.,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
v.
ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. ED CV 19-2235-DMG (PLA)
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the pertinent
20
records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court
21
accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
22
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
23
1.
The Report and Recommendation is accepted.
24
2.
The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed and the matter is
25
remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
26
/
27
/
28
/
1
3.
Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order.
2
4.
The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
3
4
5
DATED: February 16, 2021
______________________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?