Kimberly Kirk v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
Filing
32
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 31 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt that all claims of Plaintiff KIMBERLY KIRK against Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (TMCC) are dismissed, with prejudic e. Plaintiff and TMCC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. FURTHERMORE, because TMCC is the last active defendant, all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED, and this case is DISMISSED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
JS-6
1
2
5/18/2020
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIMBERLY KIRK,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORPORATION, GENESIS
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
dba TBOM – RETAIL, and
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES LLC,
Defendants.
Case No.: 5:19-cv-02402-JAK-KK
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO
DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR
CREDIT CORPORATION, WITH
PREJUDICE (DKT. 31)
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of
2
Plaintiff KIMBERLY KIRK (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR
3
CREDIT CORPORATION (“TMCC”) are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff and
4
TMCC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
5
6
7
FURTHERMORE, because TMCC is the last active defendant, all previously
set deadlines and hearings are VACATED, and this case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 18, 2020
_________________________________
John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?