Kimberly Kirk v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al

Filing 32

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 31 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt that all claims of Plaintiff KIMBERLY KIRK against Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION (TMCC) are dismissed, with prejudic e. Plaintiff and TMCC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. FURTHERMORE, because TMCC is the last active defendant, all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED, and this case is DISMISSED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 5/18/2020 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY KIRK, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, GENESIS FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. dba TBOM – RETAIL, and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Defendants. Case No.: 5:19-cv-02402-JAK-KK ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 31) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of 2 Plaintiff KIMBERLY KIRK (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR 3 CREDIT CORPORATION (“TMCC”) are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff and 4 TMCC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 7 FURTHERMORE, because TMCC is the last active defendant, all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED, and this case is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 18, 2020 _________________________________ John A. Kronstadt United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?