Jose Vela, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Filing 30

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. (see document for further details) (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE VELA, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. EDCV 19-2506-DMG (AGR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 30, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended

19

Complaint with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days after

20

entry of the order. Specifically, the Court ordered that:

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(1) The BOP’s motion to dismiss is granted and all claims against the BOP
are dismissed without leave to amend;
(2) The individual defendants are dismissed without prejudice with respect
to the FTCA claims;
(3) All official capacity claims against the individual defendants are
dismissed without leave to amend;
(4) All Section 1983 claims are dismissed without leave to amend;

1
2

(5) The Section 1985 claims against the individual defendants are
dismissed with leave to amend;

3
4

(6) The Eighth Amendment claims against Warden Langford and Associate
Warden Doe are dismissed with leave to amend; and

5

(7) The complaint against the individual defendants are dismissed without

6

prejudice unless Plaintiff files a Notice with sufficient contact information for the

7

individual defendants so that the individual defendants can be served or provides

8

good cause for his failure to do so within 30 days after entry of this Order.

9

The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to file a timely Second Amended

10

Complaint and a Notice within 30 days after entry of the Order would result in

11

dismissal of this action. (Dkt. No. 29.)

12

Plaintiff failed to file a Second Amended Complaint or request an extension

13

of time to do so. Plaintiff failed to file a Notice that contains sufficient contact

14

information for the individual defendants so that the individual defendants can be

15

served or provide good cause for his failure to do so or request an extension of

16

time.

17

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23

DATED: May 9, 2022

__________________________________
__________________________________
_
_
_ _
DOLLY M. GEE
DOLLY
E
United States District Judge
United
i

24
25
26
27
28
2