Benigo Contreras v. Riverside County et al

Filing 28

ORDER RE STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AND ENTIRE CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 27 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED as follows: (1) All of Plaintiffs claims against Defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (erroneously named as both COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT), CHAD BIANCO, DEPUTY VALDIVIAS, DEPUTY McBRIDE, AND DEPUTY KIM are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (2) To the extent that Plaintiff alleges any other claims against any other parties or DOES in this action, any and all such claims and causes of action are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (3) This entire action, including all claims by Plaintiff against any and all defendants, DOES and/or parties thereto, including all claims against any parties to the above entitled lawsuit, is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15

BENIGNO CONTRERAS,
Plaintiff,
v.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
16 RIVERSIDE SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, CHAD BIANCO, in
17 his individual and official capacity,
DEPUTY VALDIVIAS, DEPUTY
18 McBRIDE, and DEPUTY KIM and
DOES 4-10, inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. 5:20-cv-00561-JAK (SHKx)
ORDER RE STIPULATION AND
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER
DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S
CLAIMS AND ENTIRE CIVIL
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (DKT.
27)

1

Based on a review of the Stipulation and Joint Request for Order Dismissing

2 Plaintiff’s Claims and entire Civil Action with Prejudice (the “Stipulation” (Dkt. 27)),
3 sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the
4 Stipulation is APPROVED as follows:
5

1.

All of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

6 (erroneously named as both COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and RIVERSIDE
7 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT), CHAD BIANCO, DEPUTY VALDIVIAS, DEPUTY
8 McBRIDE, AND DEPUTY KIM are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
9

2.

To the extent that Plaintiff alleges any other claims against any other

10 parties or DOES in this action, any and all such claims and causes of action are hereby
11 dismissed with prejudice.
12

3.

This entire action, including all claims by Plaintiff against any and all

13 defendants, DOES and/or parties thereto, including all claims against any parties to
14 the above entitled lawsuit, is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
15
16 IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 19, 2020

_______________________________
John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge