Raymundo Ortega Ramirez v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility et al

Filing 110

ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT ANDRECOMMENDATION by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 109 ) is accepted; 2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 101 ) is granted; 3) The case is dismissed with prejudice; and 4) Judgment is to be entered accordingly. (kh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMUNDO ORTEGA RAMIREZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 SHERIFF DEPUTY BUDNIK, Case No. 5:20-02036 GW (ADS) ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendant. 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion for 18 Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 101), Plaintiff’s Statement of Non-Opposition 19 (Dkt. No. 107), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 20 (Dkt. No. 109.) No objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. The Court 21 accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 23 1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 109) is accepted; 24 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 101) is granted; 1 3. The case is dismissed with prejudice; and 2 4. Judgment is to be entered accordingly. 3 4 5 DATED: March 27, 2024 __________________________ THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?