Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company v. Roberto Conde et al

Filing 104

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT UNDER RULE 54(b) INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT YAUHENIYA LIS D/B/A GASBUDS by Judge John W. Holcomb. IT is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Final Judgment by Consent, Lis shall file with the Court and serve on counsel for Plaintiffs a sworn written statement as provided in 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a) setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Lis has complied with the permanent injunction. Lis shall immediately recall from all distribution channels any products, packaging, advertising, and promotional materials bearing or infringing on the Subject Trademarks, including the SKITTLES Mark and Trade Dress, STARBURST Mark and Trade Dress, LIFE SAVERS Mark and Trade Dress, SNICKERS Mark and Trade Dress, 3 MUSKETEERS Mark and Trade Dress, MILKY WAY Mark and Trade Dress, or any other trademarks or trade dress owned by Plaintiffs. Lis shall immediately d eliver to Plaintiffs' counsel for destruction any products, packaging, advertising, and promotional materials bearing or infringing on the Subject Trademarks, including the SKITTLES Mark and Trade Dress. Lis' wrongful conduct is deemed to be willful and this judgment is, therefore, non-dischargeable in the event she files for bankruptcy, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). (See document for further details) (yl)

Download PDF
Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:1274 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and MARS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERTO CONDE d/b/a 2020EDIBLEZ, an individual; JOEL LEDESMA d/b/a INLAND EMPIRE 420 SUPPLY, an individual; JESSICA MOHR, an individual; STEPHEN MATA d/b/a OC 420 COLLECTION, an individual; YAUHENIYA LIS d/b/a GASBUDS, an individual; EDWARD AWAD d/b/a CANNABIS 420 SUPPLY, an individual; GREEN RUSH EXTRACTS LLC, a California limited liability company; MARCO BURGOS d/b/a 2020EDIBLEZ, an individual; and DOES 4 through 10, Case No.: 5:21-cv-00777 JWH (SHKx) FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT UNDER RULE 54(b) INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT YAUHENIYA LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 29 Page ID #:1275 1 2 Consent Under Rule 54(b) Including Permanent Injunctive Relief as to Defendant 3 Yauheniya Lis d/b/a GasBuds (“Lis”), with the consent of plaintiffs Wm. Wrigley 4 Jr. Company (“Wrigley”) and Mars, Incorporated (“Mars,” and, together with 5 Wrigley, “Plaintiffs”) and Lis (Plaintiffs and Lis are collectively referred to herein 6 as the “Parties,” and each individually as a “Party”), in accordance with Rule 54(b) 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and 8 DECREED as follows: 9 1. Lis has been properly served and consents to the Court exercising 10 personal jurisdiction over her. Lis waives all defenses of lack of jurisdiction over 11 her person, improper venue, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of 12 process. 13 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. 14 3. The Parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of this Court to enforce 15 the provisions of this Final Judgment by Consent Under Rule 54(b) Including 16 Permanent Injunctive Relief as to Defendant Yauheniya Lis d/b/a GasBuds (the 17 “Final Judgment by Consent”) worldwide. 18 19 20 21 22 4. Plaintiff Wrigley is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1132 West Blackhawk Street, Chicago, Illinois 60642. 5. Plaintiff Mars is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 6885 Elm Street, McLean, Virginia 22101. 6. Defendant Lis is an individual residing in Los Angeles County, 23 California and has at all relevant times participated in the complained of activities 24 by the business known as GasBuds, which has conducted its operations through the 25 website located at https://www.gasbuds.com/. 26 Loeb & Loeb This matter having come before the Court for the entry of Final Judgment by 7. Wrigley is a recognized global leader in confections and, together with 27 its affiliates, offers a wide range of product offerings including gum, mints, and 28 candies. Wrigley markets products under dozens of well-known, distinctive, and A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 2 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 3 of 29 Page ID #:1276 1 famous brands, including SKITTLES®, STARBURST®, LIFE SAVERS®, 2 DOUBLEMINT®, and JUICY FRUIT®, to name a few. 3 8. Wrigley and its predecessors have long marketed candy and related 4 products under the famous SKITTLES® mark and trade dress, which features, 5 among other things, the word mark SKITTLES® in white block lettering, distinctive 6 rainbow designs, distinctive candy-coated lentils with an “S” imprinted thereon, and 7 a cascade design of these candy lentils (hereinafter referred to as the “Skittles Trade 8 Dress”), examples of which are shown below: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 3 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 4 of 29 Page ID #:1277 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 For 50 years, Wrigley and its predecessors-in-interest have 10 continuously used the SKITTLES® mark to advertise, promote, and sell candy 11 throughout the United States. 12 10. Wrigley has earned billions of dollars in revenues from the sale of 13 SKITTLES® candy in the United States. Many millions of people throughout the 14 country have purchased or consumed SKITTLES® candy. In fact, SKITTLES® 15 candy has been the best-selling non-chocolate candy in the United States for years. 16 11. Wrigley has invested many millions of dollars to promote SKITTLES® 17 candy. Wrigley’s advertisements and commercials for SKITTLES® have been seen 18 by many millions of people nationwide. Wrigley advertises SKITTLES® candy 19 during the Super Bowl and other highly watched events. 20 12. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 21 SKITTLES® brand, Wrigley enjoys extensive trademark rights in the SKITTLES® 22 mark and the Skittles Trade Dress. 23 Loeb & Loeb 9. 13. Wrigley owns numerous federal registrations for its SKITTLES® mark 24 and the Skittles Trade Dress, including, but not limited to, U.S. Reg. Nos. 25 1,221,105; 2,535,714; 4,377,303; and 4,983,664 (such federal registrations, 26 collectively with the common law trademark rights in the SKITTLES® mark and 27 Skittles Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the “SKITTLES® Mark and 28 Trade Dress”). A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 4 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 5 of 29 Page ID #:1278 1 14. Similarly, Wrigley and its predecessors have long marketed candy and 2 related products under the famous STARBURST® mark and trade dress, which 3 features, among other things, the word mark STARBURST® in stylized lettering 4 and distinctive wrappers with an “S” imprinted thereon (hereinafter referred to as 5 the “Starburst Trade Dress”), examples of which are shown below: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 For 50 years, Wrigley and its predecessors-in-interest have 21 continuously used the STARBURST® mark to advertise, promote, and sell candy 22 throughout the United States. 23 16. Wrigley has earned billions of dollars in revenue from the sale of 24 STARBURST® candy in the United States. Many millions of people throughout 25 the country have purchased or consumed STARBURST® candy. 26 Loeb & Loeb 15. 17. Wrigley has invested many millions of dollars to promote 27 STARBURST® candy. Wrigley’s advertisements and commercials for 28 STARBURST® have been seen by many millions of people nationwide. A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 5 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 6 of 29 Page ID #:1279 1 18. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 2 STARBURST® brand, Wrigley enjoys extensive trademark rights in the 3 STARBURST® mark and the Starburst Trade Dress. 4 19. Wrigley owns numerous federal registrations for its STARBURST® 5 mark and trade dress, including, but not limited to, U.S. Reg. Nos. 1,000,007; 6 1,545,544; 4,179,436; 4,268,392; and 4,625,960 (such federal registrations, 7 collectively with the common law trademark rights in the STARBURST® mark and 8 Starburst Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the “STARBURST® Mark and 9 Trade Dress”). 10 20. Additionally, Wrigley and its predecessors have long marketed candy 11 and related products under the famous LIFE SAVERS® mark and trade dress, 12 which features, among other things, the word mark LIFE SAVERS® in stylized 13 lettering and distinctive circular candies with “LIFE SAVERS” imprinted thereon 14 (hereinafter referred to as the “Life Savers Trade Dress”). An example of LIFE 15 SAVERS® packaging is shown below: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 6 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 7 of 29 Page ID #:1280 1 For 50 years, Wrigley and its predecessors-in-interest have 2 continuously used the LIFE SAVERS® mark to advertise, promote, and sell candy 3 throughout the United States. 4 22. Wrigley has earned billions of dollars in revenue from the sale of LIFE 5 SAVERS® candy in the United States. Many millions of people throughout the 6 country have purchased or consumed LIFE SAVERS® candy. 7 23. Wrigley has invested many millions of dollars to promote LIFE 8 SAVERS® candy. Wrigley’s advertisements and commercials for LIFE SAVERS® 9 have been seen by many millions of people nationwide. 10 24. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 11 LIFE SAVERS® brand, Wrigley enjoys extensive trademark rights in the LIFE 12 SAVERS® mark and the Life Savers Trade Dress. 13 25. Wrigley owns numerous federal registrations for its LIFE SAVERS® 14 mark and trade dress, including, but not limited to, U.S. Reg. Nos. 115,895; 15 236,694; 1,130,067; 2,358,709; 4,214,036; and 4,769,489 (such federal registrations 16 collectively with the common law trademark rights in the LIFE SAVERS® mark 17 and Life Savers Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the “LIFE SAVERS® 18 Mark and Trade Dress”). 19 26. Mars is a recognized global leader in chocolates, confections, and other 20 food products. Mars offers a wide range of product offerings, including chocolate 21 bars, under dozens of well-known, distinctive, and famous brands, including 22 SNICKERS®, 3 MUSKETEERS®, MILKY WAY®, M&M’S®, and TWIX®, to 23 name a few. 24 Loeb & Loeb 21. 27. Mars has long marketed candy and related products under the famous 25 SNICKERS® mark and trade dress, which features, among other things, the word 26 mark SNICKERS® in blue block lettering in a parallelogram outlined in red 27 (hereinafter referred to as the “Snickers Trade Dress”), examples of which are 28 shown below: A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 7 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 8 of 29 Page ID #:1281 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28. For almost 100 years, Mars has continuously used the SNICKERS® mark to advertise, promote, and sell chocolate bars throughout the United States. 29. Mars has earned billions of dollars in revenues from the sale of 25 SNICKERS® candy and other SNICKERS® branded products in the United States. 26 Many millions of people throughout the country have purchased or consumed 27 SNICKERS® candy and other SNICKERS® branded products. In fact, the 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 8 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 9 of 29 Page ID #:1282 1 SNICKERS® chocolate bar has been one of the best-selling chocolate bars in the 2 United States for years. 3 30. Mars has invested many millions of dollars to promote SNICKERS® 4 candy. Mars’ advertisements and commercials for SNICKERS® have been seen by 5 many millions of people nationwide. Mars has advertised SNICKERS® candy 6 during the Super Bowl and other highly watched events. 7 31. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 8 SNICKERS® brand, Mars enjoys extensive trademark rights in the SNICKERS® 9 mark and the Snickers Trade Dress. 10 32. Mars owns numerous federal registrations for its SNICKERS® mark, 11 parallelogram design, and chocolate bar design, including, but not limited to, U.S. 12 Reg. Nos. 239,311; 1,270,149; 1,563,583; 1,593,286; 2,061,849; 2,082,946; 13 2,104,555; 2,911,432; 3,063,755; 3,120,788; 5,047,574; 6,465,002; and 6,480,397 14 (such federal registrations, collectively with the common law trademark rights in the 15 SNICKERS® mark and Snickers Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the 16 “SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress”). 17 33. Similarly, Mars has long marketed candy and related products under 18 the famous 3 MUSKETEERS® mark and trade dress, which features, among other 19 things, the word mark 3 MUSKETEERS® in stylized red lettering outlined in blue 20 and the number 3 inside a blue shield design (hereinafter referred to as the “3 21 Musketeers Trade Dress”), an example of which is shown below: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 9 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 10 of 29 Page ID #:1283 1 2 3 34. For 90 years, Mars has continuously used the 3 MUSKETEERS® mark to advertise, promote, and sell chocolate bars throughout the United States. 35. Mars has earned millions of dollars in revenues from the sale of 3 4 MUSKETEERS® candy in the United States. Many millions of people throughout 5 the country have purchased or consumed 3 MUSKETEERS® chocolate products. 6 In fact, the 3 MUSKETEERS® chocolate bar has been a popular chocolate bar in 7 the United States for years. 8 9 10 11 36. Mars has invested many millions of dollars to promote 3 MUSKETEERS® candy. Mars’ advertisements and commercials for 3 MUSKETEERS® have been seen by many millions of people nationwide. 37. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 12 3 MUSKETEERS® brand, Mars enjoys extensive trademark rights in the 3 13 MUSKETEERS® mark and the 3 Musketeers Trade Dress. 14 38. Mars owns federal registrations for its 3 MUSKETEERS® mark and 15 the 3-shield design, including, but not limited to, U.S. Reg. Nos. 1,272,036; 16 1,683,918; 2,675,569; 3,338,622; and 5,596,164 (such federal registrations, 17 collectively with the common law trademark rights in the 3 MUSKETEERS® mark 18 and 3 Musketeers Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the “3 19 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress”). 20 39. Additionally, Mars has long marketed candy and related products under 21 the famous MILKY WAY® mark and trade dress, which features, among other 22 things, the word mark MILKY WAY® in stylized lettering on a swirled ellipse 23 design (hereinafter referred to as the “Milky Way Trade Dress”), examples of which 24 are shown below: 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 10 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 11 of 29 Page ID #:1284 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 For 100 years, Mars has continuously used the MILKY WAY® mark to advertise, promote, and sell chocolate bars throughout the United States. 41. Mars has earned millions of dollars in revenues from the sale of 17 MILKY WAY® candy and other MILKY WAY® branded products in the United 18 States. Many millions of people throughout the country have purchased or 19 consumed MILKY WAY® candy. In fact, the MILKY WAY® chocolate bar has 20 been a popular chocolate bar in the United States for years. 21 42. Mars has invested many millions of dollars to promote MILKY 22 WAY® candy. Mars’ advertisements and commercials for MILKY WAY® have 23 been seen by many millions of people nationwide. 24 43. Based on the wide-spread and long-standing use and recognition of the 25 MILKY WAY® brand, Mars enjoys extensive trademark rights in the MILKY 26 WAY® mark and the Milky Way Trade Dress. 27 28 Loeb & Loeb 40. A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 44. Mars owns numerous federal registrations for its MILKY WAY® mark, including, but not limited to, U.S. Reg. Nos. 1,161,203; 1,272,034; 1,508,474; 11 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 12 of 29 Page ID #:1285 1 1,533,492; 2,316,816; 2,335,708; 2,430,868; 2,498,018; 2,514,593; and 4,535,789 2 (such federal registrations, collectively with the common law trademark rights in the 3 MILKY WAY® mark and Milky Way Trade Dress, are hereinafter referred to as the 4 “MILKY WAY® Mark and Trade Dress”). 5 Each of the above-referenced trademark registrations are valid, 6 subsisting, and in full force under 15 U.S.C. § 1065, and, together with Plaintiffs’ 7 extensive common law rights, make the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, 8 STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, and LIFE SAVERS® Mark and Trade 9 Dress (collectively, the “Wrigley Trademarks”), and the SNICKERS® Mark and 10 Trade Dress, 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, and MILKY WAY® Mark 11 and Trade Dress (collectively, the “Mars Trademarks” and, together with the 12 Wrigley Trademarks, the “Subject Trademarks”) valuable assets owned by 13 Plaintiffs. 14 46. 15 16 17 18 Loeb & Loeb 45. Lis, doing business as GasBuds, has engaged in the marketing of edible cannabis candy products. 47. Lis used the Subject Trademarks, without authorization or license, in the marketing of her products. 48. Specifically, Lis has marketed the products online via the GasBuds 19 website, located at https://www.gasbuds.com/, which violates Plaintiffs’ rights in the 20 Subject Trademarks. Those products include: (1) “Medicated Sour Skittles 600mg 21 THC”; (2) “Medicated Sour Skittles – 400mg THC”; (3) “Medicated Yellow Sour 22 Skittles – 400mg THC”; (4) “High Tolerance Concentrates Skittlez – 1g Cartridge”; 23 (5) “High Tolerance – Shorty’s 5 personal infused pre-rolls (Blue Skittles)”; 24 (6) “BPB – Zerbert (ZkittlesXSunsent Sherbert) – 3.5g”; (7) “CANABOTANICA 25 Shake – Cherry Pie X Sherbert X Zkitles 28g”; (8) “High Tolerance Live Resin 26 Concentrates – Watermelon Zkittlez – 1g Cartridge”; (9) “High Tolerance 27 Concentrates ZKITTLES – 1g Cartridge”; (10) “Interface Live Resin Cart – 28 Watermelon Zkittlez 1G”; (11) “Stndrd Company Zkittles – Disposable 500mg”; A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 12 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 13 of 29 Page ID #:1286 1 (12) “WARRIORS Zkittles – Cartridge 1g”; (13) “STARBUDS Gummies – 500mg 2 THC”; (14) “STARBUDS Medicated Gummies Original – 500mg THC”; 3 (15) “STARBUDS Medicated Gummies Sour – 500mg THC”; (16) “Medicated 4 Cannaburst Gummies – 500mg THC”; (17) “Mini Starbuds Medicated Gummies – 5 408mg THC”; (18) “Medicated Life Savers Gummies Wild Berries 600mg”; 6 (19) “Love Saverz Gummies – Collisions 600mg”; (20) “THC Sni*kers Chocolate 7 Bar – 1000mg”; (21) “THC Chocolate Bar (like a sni**ers) – 1000mg”; (22) “3 8 Marijuanas Chocolate Bar – 1000mg”; and (23) “THC Chocolate Milky Weed – 9 1000mg thc.” These products, collectively referred to as the “GasBuds Infringing 10 Products,” are pictured below as they appear or appeared on GasBud’s website: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 13 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 14 of 29 Page ID #:1287 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 14 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 15 of 29 Page ID #:1288 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 15 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 16 of 29 Page ID #:1289 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 16 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 17 of 29 Page ID #:1290 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 17 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 18 of 29 Page ID #:1291 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 18 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 19 of 29 Page ID #:1292 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 19 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 20 of 29 Page ID #:1293 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 20 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 21 of 29 Page ID #:1294 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 21 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 22 of 29 Page ID #:1295 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 22 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 23 of 29 Page ID #:1296 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 23 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 24 of 29 Page ID #:1297 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 24 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 25 of 29 Page ID #:1298 1 With respect to the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, Lis adopted 2 and used the SKITTLES® mark in plain text and white block lettering, distinctive 3 rainbow designs, images of candy-coated lentils with an “S” imprinted thereon, 4 and/or a design featuring such candy lentils cascading along an upside-down 5 rainbow, marks and trade dress that are identical to, substantially indistinguishable 6 from, and/or imitations of the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress and the marks 7 and logos in the SKITTLES® registrations. 8 9 50. With respect to the STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, Lis adopted and used the STARBURST® and “Starbuds” marks with stylized lettering and 10 images of square candies with a stylized “S” imprinted thereon, marks and trade 11 dress that are identical to, substantially indistinguishable from, and/or imitations of 12 the STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress and the marks and logos in the 13 STARBURST® registrations. 14 51. With respect to the LIFE SAVERS® Mark and Trade Dress, Lis 15 adopted and used images of the LIFE SAVERS® distinctive circular candies, marks 16 and trade dress that are identical to, substantially indistinguishable from, and/or 17 imitations of the LIFE SAVERS® Mark and Trade Dress and the marks and logos 18 in the LIFE SAVERS® registrations. 19 52. With respect to the SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, Lis adopted 20 and used the SNICKERS® mark in blue block lettering in a parallelogram outlined 21 in red, marks and trade dress that are identical to, substantially indistinguishable 22 from, and/or imitations of the SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress and the marks 23 and logos in the SNICKERS® registrations. 24 Loeb & Loeb 49. 53. With respect to the 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, Lis 25 adopted and used the mark and trade dress featuring the number “3” inside a blue 26 shield design, marks and trade dress that are identical to, substantially 27 indistinguishable from, and/or imitations of the 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade 28 Dress and the marks and logos in the 3 MUSKETEERS® registrations. A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 25 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 26 of 29 Page ID #:1299 1 54. a. 2 Counterfeiting of the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, the 3 STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, the LIFE SAVERS® Mark and 4 Trade Dress, the SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, and the 3 5 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114; b. 6 7 9 c. d. Unfair competition and deceptive acts and practices in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A); e. 12 13 Dilution of the inherently distinctive and famous Subject Trademarks in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c); 10 11 Infringement of the Subject Trademarks in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125(a); 8 Violation of California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq.; f. 14 Dilution of the inherently distinctive and famous Subject 15 Trademarks in violation of California Business and Professions Code 16 § 14247. 17 55. This is an exceptional case in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 1117. 18 56. Lis and her respective agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, 19 attorneys, and all other persons acting in concert or in participation with or affiliated 20 with Lis, jointly and severally, are permanently enjoined and restrained: 21 Loeb & Loeb Lis’ complained-of acts above constitute the following: a. From directly or indirectly engaging in any further trademark 22 counterfeiting, trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair 23 competition, or deceptive business practices relating to the Subject 24 Trademarks, including the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, the 25 STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, the LIFE SAVERS® Mark and 26 Trade Dress, the SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, the 3 27 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, and the MILKY WAY® Mark and 28 Trade Dress, or any other trademarks or trade dress owned by Plaintiffs; A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 26 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 27 of 29 Page ID #:1300 b. 1 2 selling, or distributing any products that feature, copy, imitate, simulate, or 3 are confusingly similar to, or are likely to dilute the distinctive nature of, or 4 tarnish the goodwill of, the Subject Trademarks, including the SKITTLES® 5 Mark and Trade Dress, the STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, the LIFE 6 SAVERS® Mark and Trade Dress, the SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 7 the 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, and the MILKY WAY® 8 Mark and Trade Dress, or any other trademarks or trade dress owned by 9 Plaintiffs; c. 10 From representing by any means whatsoever, directly or 11 indirectly, that any products sold or services rendered by Lis and/or GasBuds 12 are associated with, sponsored by, licensed by, and/or connected or affiliated 13 with Plaintiffs, or from otherwise taking any action likely to cause confusion, 14 mistake, or deception on the part of purchasers as to the origin or licensing of 15 Lis’ and/or GasBud’s products or services; d. 16 17 19 From otherwise competing unfairly with Plaintiffs in any manner or engaging in deceptive conduct; e. 18 From continuing to perform in any manner whatsoever any of the acts complained of in the First Amended Complaint as to Plaintiffs; and 20 f. 21 aforesaid acts. 22 57. From causing, engaging in, or permitting others to do any of the Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Final Judgment by Consent, 23 Lis shall file with the Court and serve on counsel for Plaintiffs a sworn written 24 statement as provided in 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a) setting forth in detail the manner and 25 form in which Lis has complied with the permanent injunction. 26 Loeb & Loeb From making, manufacturing, advertising, marketing, offering, 58. Lis shall immediately recall from all distribution channels any 27 products, packaging, advertising, and promotional materials bearing or infringing on 28 the Subject Trademarks, including the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 27 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 28 of 29 Page ID #:1301 1 STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, LIFE SAVERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 2 SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 3 MILKY WAY® Mark and Trade Dress, or any other trademarks or trade dress 4 owned by Plaintiffs. 5 59. Lis shall immediately deliver to Plaintiffs’ counsel for destruction any 6 products, packaging, advertising, and promotional materials bearing or infringing on 7 the Subject Trademarks, including the SKITTLES® Mark and Trade Dress, 8 STARBURST® Mark and Trade Dress, LIFE SAVERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 9 SNICKERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 3 MUSKETEERS® Mark and Trade Dress, 10 MILKY WAY® Mark and Trade Dress, or any other trademarks or trade dress 11 owned by Plaintiffs, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118. Any electronic equivalents of 12 such materials shall be immediately deleted. 13 60. Lis shall immediately cease sales of the products described above on 14 the GasBuds website, located at https://www.gasbuds.com/, and in any other 15 locations on the Internet, including other websites owned or operated by Lis or any 16 of her affiliates, and any social media platforms owned or operated by Lis or any of 17 her affiliates. 18 61. Lis’ wrongful conduct is deemed to be willful and this judgment is, 19 therefore, non-dischargeable in the event she files for bankruptcy, pursuant to 11 20 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). 21 62. The Parties shall comply with the terms of the confidential settlement 22 agreement entered into by and between the Parties and executed concurrently with 23 their stipulation to this Final Judgment by Consent (the “Settlement Agreement”), 24 the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference. 25 63. This Final Judgment by Consent shall have no effect on any of 26 Plaintiffs’ claims against any other defendants to this action besides Lis. 27 Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action, 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 28 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS Case 5:21-cv-00777-JWH-SHK Document 104 Filed 01/17/23 Page 29 of 29 Page ID #:1302 1 as it relates to Lis, to enforce this Final Judgment by Consent and the terms of the 2 Settlement Agreement. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED 4 5 6 Dated: January 17 , 2023 The Honorable John W. Holcomb UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 29 FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT RE: LIS D/B/A GASBUDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?