Sarah Joyce Jackson v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 22

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff's and Defendants' Counsel fro Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report by Judge John W. Holcomb. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/16/2022 AT 12:00 noon. (twdb) Modified on 5/9/2022 (twdb).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No.

EDCV 21-01011-JWH (SPx)

Date May 9, 2022

Title Sarah Joyce Jackson v. County of San Bernardino, et al.

Present: The Honorable

JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Present

None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions
Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff’s and Defendants’
Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report
On March 28, 2022, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling
Conference for May 20, 2022 [ECF No. 21]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not
later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today’s date, the
parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, Brenton
Aitken Hands and Jerry L. Steering, and counsel for Defendants, Adam Lee
Miederhoff, to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount
of $500 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Counsel are
DIRECTED to respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday,
May 16, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Counsel’s failure to respond—or counsel’s filing of
an inadequate response—may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1 of 1

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk iv