Terrence A. Hawkins v. Monique Rene Urteaga

Filing 6

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order why the Complaint should not be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [See document for details.] (es)

Download PDF
Case 5:21-cv-01434-DMG-DFM Document 6 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:30 Case 5:21-cv-01434-DMG-DFM Document 6 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 49-50 (1999). “Acting under color of state law is ‘a jurisdictional requisite for a § 1983 action.’” Gritchen v. Collier, 254 F.3d 807, 812 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 46 (1988)). “The traditional definition of acting under color of state law requires that the defendant in a § 1983 action have exercised power ‘possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law.’” West, 487 U.S. at 49 (citation omitted); McDade v. West, 223 F.3d 1135, 1139 (9th Cir. 2000) (citation omitted). In other words, “the under-color-ofstate-law element of § 1983 excludes from its reach ‘“merely private conduct, no matter how discriminatory or wrongful.”’” American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., 526 U.S. at 50 (citations omitted); accord Sutton v. Providence St. Joseph Med. Ctr., 192 F.3d 826, 835 (9th Cir. 1999). Here, Plaintiff does not allege that Defendant violated any right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Nor does he allege that Defendant was acting under color of state law. Instead, he alleges strictly private conduct by Defendant in stealing approximately $21,000 worth of his jewelry. See Complaint at 5-9.1 These allegations do not appear to state a federal civil rights claim. Moreover, the Court does not see how these deficiencies could be cured with leave to amend. For these reasons, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing within twentyone (21) days of the date of this order why the Complaint should not be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. : Initials of Preparer nb These page numbers follow CM/ECF pagination, which is added to the top of each page entered into the Court’s electronic case filing system. 1 CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk: nb Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?