Terry McDonald v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 20

MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURTS REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. The Court ORDERS counsel for PlaintiffSusan B. Grabarsky; Frank N. Darras; and Phillip S. Batherand counsel for Defendant Jason A. James and Patricia A. Ellisto show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to comply with the Courts Reassignment Order. Counsel is required to respond in writing on or before August 11, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Counsels failure to respond, or counsels filing of an unsatisfactory response, may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES— GENERAL Case No. Title 5:22-cv-00747-SSS-SHKx Date July 28, 2022 Terry McDonald v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT’S REASSIGNMENT ORDER On June 25, 2022, the Court entered its Reassignment Order (the “Order”) [Dkt. 18], that 1) informed the parties of the case reassignment; 2) provided this Court’s location; 3) provided the parties vital information on previously scheduled deadlines and dates and how this Court would be addressing those deadlines and dates; 4) directed each party to review and become familiar with any all applicable standing orders; and 5) ordered the parties to file a joint case management statement within fifteen days from the date of the Order. As of today’s date, the parties have failed to file the Court-ordered case management statement. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff—Susan B. Grabarsky; Frank N. Darras; and Phillip S. Bather—and counsel for Defendant— Jason A. James and Patricia A. Ellis—to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to comply with the Court’s Reassignment Order. Page 1 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk iv Counsel is required to respond in writing on or before August 11, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Counsel’s failure to respond, or counsel’s filing of an unsatisfactory response, may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 2 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk iv

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?