Feliciano Coronel v. C. Koenig
Filing
11
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Fred W. Slaughter for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 10 The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. [See Order for further details.] (es)
Case 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD Document 11 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1524
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FELICIANO CORONEL,
Petitioner,
12
13
v.
14
15
16
C. KOENIG, Warden,
Respondent.
17
Case No. 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD
ORDER ACCEPTING
REPORT AND ADOPTING,
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
18
19
20
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the
21
records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States
22
Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Because the time for objections has passed with
23
none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in
24
the Report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v.
25
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court accepts the
26
27
28
Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the
Petition is dismissed with prejudice.
Case 5:22-cv-01022-FWS-PD Document 11 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1525
1
Further, for the reasons stated in the Report, the Court finds that
2
Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
3
right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C.
4
§ 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336
5
(2003).
6
7
DATED: January 17, 2023
8
9
10
11
HON. FRED W. SLAUGHTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?