Anthony Armendariz v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of the Defendant Lance Williams and against the Plaintiff Anthony Armendariz; That the Plaintiff shall take nothing; Defendant shall recover costs as the prevailing party pursuant to FRCP 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
JS6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 11 ANTHONY ARMENDARIZ, an 12 individual, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 5:22-cv-02124-RGK-MRW vs. Trial Date: October 24, 2023 15 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, municipal entity; DOE SAN 16 BERNARDINO DEPUTY; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 19 JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 This action came on regularly for trial on October 24, 2023 in Courtroom 23 “850” of the United States District Court, before the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, 24 United States District Court Judge. Plaintiff ANTHONY ARMENDARIZ 25 ("Plaintiff") was represented by Christian Contreras, Esq. of Law Offices of 26 Christian Contreras and Denisse O. Gastelum of Gastelum Law APC. The 27 Defendant Lance Williams (“Defendant”) was represented by Christopher P. 28 Wesierski and Michelle R. Prescott of Wesierski & Zurek LLP. I1986353-1 SBD-0016 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?