Anthony Armendariz v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
87
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of the Defendant Lance Williams and against the Plaintiff Anthony Armendariz; That the Plaintiff shall take nothing; Defendant shall recover costs as the prevailing party pursuant to FRCP 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
JS6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
11
ANTHONY ARMENDARIZ, an
12 individual,
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER
TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 5:22-cv-02124-RGK-MRW
vs.
Trial Date:
October 24, 2023
15 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
municipal entity; DOE SAN
16 BERNARDINO DEPUTY; and DOES
1-10, inclusive,
17
Defendant.
18
19
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY
20
21
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22
This action came on regularly for trial on October 24, 2023 in Courtroom
23 “850” of the United States District Court, before the Honorable R. Gary Klausner,
24 United States District Court Judge. Plaintiff ANTHONY ARMENDARIZ
25 ("Plaintiff") was represented by Christian Contreras, Esq. of Law Offices of
26 Christian Contreras and Denisse O. Gastelum of Gastelum Law APC. The
27 Defendant Lance Williams (“Defendant”) was represented by Christopher P.
28 Wesierski and Michelle R. Prescott of Wesierski & Zurek LLP.
I1986353-1 SBD-0016
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?