Christopher Urquijo et al v. State of California et al
Filing
84
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/12/2024. (twdb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No.
Title
5:22-cv-02133-SSS-DTBx
Date August 29, 2024
Christopher Urquijo, et al. v. State of California, et al.
Present: The Honorable
SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Irene Vazquez
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Present
None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for
Lack of Prosecution
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without
prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90
days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m).
In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff has not served the summons and
complaint on one or more Defendants. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion,
hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before September 12, 2024,
why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to Defendant Danielle Loftin,
who has not been served, for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for
submission without oral argument. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged
if Plaintiff files, before the deadline set forth above, a proof of service of the
summons and complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Page 1 of 1
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk iv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?