Randy Newland v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P.

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by January 25,2023, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff can satisfy this order by requesting that default be entered against Defendant pursuant to Rule 55 by the date stated above. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely respond to this OSC in the manner stated above may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and follow Courtorders. (dc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES— GENERAL Case No. Title 5:22-cv-02165-SHK Date January 19, 2023 Randy Newland v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P. Present: The Honorable Shashi H. Kewalramani, United States Magistrate Judge D. Castellanos Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On December 5, 2022, Plaintiff Randy Newland (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) against Defendant Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (“Defendant”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. On December 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service of Summons of Complaint (“Proof of Service” or “POS”), indicating that Plaintiff served the summons and Complaint on Defendant on December 14, 2022. ECF No. 7. Generally, defendants must answer or otherwise respond to a complaint within twentyone days after being served with the summons and Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). Here, because service was effectuated on December 14, 2022, Defendant’s answer was due twenty-one days later, on January 4, 2023. As of the date of this Order, Defendant has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the Complaint and Plaintiff has not requested that default be entered against Defendant as authorized under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55. As such, this litigation is stalled. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by January 25, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff can satisfy this order by requesting that default be entered against Defendant pursuant to Rule 55 by the date stated above. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely respond to this OSC in the manner stated above may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and follow Court orders. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 1 of 1    CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL  Initials of Deputy Clerk iv   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?