Edith Rogers v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John W. Holcomb for Report and Recommendation 16 . This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. (hr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EDITH ROGERS,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Second
2
Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 14, the Report and Recommendation of
3
United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) dated December 7, 2023, Dkt. No. 16,
4
and all other records and files herein. The time for filing objections to the Report
5
has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, it is hereby
6
ORDERED as follows:
7
8
1.
Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
9
2.
10
amend.
11
The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
-0-4j6fdfh
DATED: _________________
_________________
___
__
___________
___
__ ________________
____
JOHN
W.. HOLCOMB
HN
NW
HOLCO
OMB
B
UNITED
DISTRICT JUDGE
ITED STATES DISTRIC
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?