Edith Rogers v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 17

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John W. Holcomb for Report and Recommendation 16 . This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EDITH ROGERS,

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 5:23-cv-01022-JWH-RAO
Plaintiff,

v.
COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Second

2

Amended Complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 14, the Report and Recommendation of

3

United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) dated December 7, 2023, Dkt. No. 16,

4

and all other records and files herein. The time for filing objections to the Report

5

has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, it is hereby

6

ORDERED as follows:

7
8

1.

Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

9

2.

10

amend.

11

The findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

 -0-4
j6
fdfh
DATED: _________________

_________________
___
__
___________
___
__ ________________
____
JOHN
W.. HOLCOMB
HN
NW
HOLCO
OMB
B
UNITED
DISTRICT JUDGE
ITED STATES DISTRIC

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2