Ryan Lokker v. Walmart Inc., et al
Filing
119
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant the amount of $311,900, plus post judgment interest at the rate of 5.20 percent per annum, along with costs; AND Pla intiffs first cause of action for retaliation in violation of Labor Code section 1102.5 is time-barred, and thus judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's claim under Labor Code section 1102.5. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
JS6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 Ryan Lokker, an individual,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Walmart, Inc., a Delaware
12 Corporation; and Does 1-10, inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
CASE NO: 5:23-cv-01106-RGK-SHK
District Judge: R. Gary Klausner
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Trial: April 9, 2024
Verdict: April 11, 2024
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
2
WHEREAS, this matter was tried by a jury beginning April 9, 2024, with Judge
3 R. Gary Klausner presiding;
4
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2024, the Court ruled that Plaintiff Ryan Lokker’s
5 first cause of action for retaliation in violation of Labor Code § 1102.5 was time barred
6 under a one-year statute of limitations;
7
WHEREAS, as a result, the only claim presented to the jury was Plaintiff’s
8 second cause of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy;
9
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2024, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff
10 and against Defendant Walmart Inc. on his second cause of action for wrongful
11 termination in violation of public policy; AND
12
WHEREAS, the jury awarded Plaintiff $11,900 in economic damages and
13 $300,000 in noneconomic damages.
14
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
15
Plaintiff shall recover from Defendant the amount of three hundred and eleven
16 thousand and nine hundred dollars ($311,900), plus post judgment interest at the rate
17 of 5.20% per annum, along with costs; AND
18
Plaintiff’s first cause of action for retaliation in violation of Labor Code §
19 1102.5 is time-barred, and thus judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of
20 Defendant on Plaintiff’s claim under Labor Code § 1102.5.
21
22 DATE: 5/13/2024
______________________
23
Hon. R. Gary Klausner
24
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?