James Hightower v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital et al

Filing 71

JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 70 It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above-captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 2. Fictitiously named Defendants Does 1-10 are DISMISSED. 3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. To the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES HIGHTOWER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL doing business as Kaiser Permanente, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 5:23-cv-01506-JWH-DTB JUDGMENT 1 2 Pursuant to the Order Dismissing Case filed substantially contemporaneously herewith, 3 It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 4 1. 5 This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above- captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331. 6 2. Fictitiously named Defendants Does 1-10 are DISMISSED. 7 3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 8 4. To the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such 9 10 request is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: July 8, 2024 John W. Holcomb UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?