Giovana Aguilar v. Warden
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER PETITIONER'S REQUEST by Judge George H. Wu, re RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss; Withdrawal of 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 17 . In response to the dismissal motion, Petitioner filed a statement asking to voluntarily dismiss the action. (Docket # 17.) The request is GRANTED. The action will be dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
GIOVANA AGUILAR,
Petitioner,
14
v.
15
16
Case No. ED CV 23-1526 (MRW)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER
PETITIONER’S REQUEST
ELISEO RICOLCOL, Warden,
Respondent.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
This is habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 involving a
federal prisoner. The pro se petition alleges that the Bureau of Prisons
failed to properly determine Petitioner’s custody release date under the
First Step Act. (Docket # 1.)
2.
After the magistrate judge screened the petition, the
government moved to dismiss the action. (Docket # 6, 13.) The dismissal
motion explained and defended the BOP’s release date calculation. The
government also contended that Petitioner’s action was premature and
commenced without properly exhausting administrative remedies.
1
2
3
4
3.
In response to the dismissal motion, Petitioner filed a
statement asking to voluntarily dismiss the action. (Docket # 17.)
4.
The request is GRANTED. The action will be dismissed
without prejudice.
5
5.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to close the action.
7
8
9
Dated: November 14, 2023
10
11
12
_______________________________
HON. GEORGE H. WU
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Presented by:
13
14
15
16
____________________________________
HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?