Giovana Aguilar v. Warden

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER PETITIONER'S REQUEST by Judge George H. Wu, re RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss; Withdrawal of 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 17 . In response to the dismissal motion, Petitioner filed a statement asking to voluntarily dismiss the action. (Docket # 17.) The request is GRANTED. The action will be dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 GIOVANA AGUILAR, Petitioner, 14 v. 15 16 Case No. ED CV 23-1526 (MRW) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER PETITIONER’S REQUEST ELISEO RICOLCOL, Warden, Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. This is habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 involving a federal prisoner. The pro se petition alleges that the Bureau of Prisons failed to properly determine Petitioner’s custody release date under the First Step Act. (Docket # 1.) 2. After the magistrate judge screened the petition, the government moved to dismiss the action. (Docket # 6, 13.) The dismissal motion explained and defended the BOP’s release date calculation. The government also contended that Petitioner’s action was premature and commenced without properly exhausting administrative remedies. 1 2 3 4 3. In response to the dismissal motion, Petitioner filed a statement asking to voluntarily dismiss the action. (Docket # 17.) 4. The request is GRANTED. The action will be dismissed without prejudice. 5 5. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to close the action. 7 8 9 Dated: November 14, 2023 10 11 12 _______________________________ HON. GEORGE H. WU SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Presented by: 13 14 15 16 ____________________________________ HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?