Jose PePe Mitchell v. J. Skeleton

Filing 42

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. 38 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 32 ) to reconsider the September 26, 2024 order dismissin g the Complaint for failure to comply with the local rules (Dkt. 25 ) is DENIED. The Complaint remains dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his claims in a new lawsuit if or when they are no longer Heck-barred. [See Order for further details.] (san)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE PEPE MITCHELL,

12

Case No. 5:24-cv-00104-MWF-KES

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. SKELTON,

15

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant.

16
17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all

19

the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the

20

United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 38). No objections to the Report and

21

Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed.

22

The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United

23

States Magistrate Judge.

24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying

25

Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 32) to reconsider the September 26, 2024 order dismissing

26

the Complaint for failure to comply with the local rules (Dkt. 25) is DENIED. The

27

//

28

1

Complaint remains dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his claims in

2

a new lawsuit if or when they are no longer Heck-barred.

3
4
5
6

DATED: March 10, 2025

____________________________________
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2