Dejon Hemphill v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
39
ORDER RE: 1) DISMISSING SUIT WITH PREJUDICE; AND 2) WAIVING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, including all of Plaintiff's claims as to all current and former Defendants. IT IS FURTHER DECREED that each party has waived all claims for attorneys' fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. 1988 and any other provision of law. RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case 37 . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
) Case No.: 5:24-cv-00825-KK-DTB
)
ORDER RE:
Plaintiff,
)
) 1) DISMISSING SUIT WITH
vs.
)
PREJUDICE; AND
) 2) WAIVING ATTORNEYS’ FEES
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO;
)
AND COSTS
JACKSON TUBBS; MICHAEL
)
VUICICH; and DOES 3-10, inclusive, ) [Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
) [[Proposed] Order submitted concurrently
Defendants.
____________________________________ ) herewith]
DEJON HEMPHILL,
Matter For Determination Before The
Honorable Kenly Kiya Kato
21
22
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
ORDER RE DISMISSING SUIT WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant
3
to the Stipulation of the Parties and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule
4
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, including all of
5
Plaintiff’s claims as to all current and former Defendants.
6
7
8
IT IS FURTHER DECREED that each party has waived all claims for
attorneys’ fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. 1988 and any other provision of law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
March 11, 2025
Dated: ______________
HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE DISMISSING SUIT WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?