James S. Bennett v. San Bernardino County et al

Filing 20

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Order (1) DISMISSING Action; (2) VACATING the December 2, 2024 hearing; and (3) DIRECTING the Clerk to Close the Case. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)

Download PDF
and (5) the availability of less drastic sanctions. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (failure to follow local rules); Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 642 (failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order). The Court need not weigh these factors explicitly. See Ghazali, 46 F.3d at 53–54. The Court finds that dismissal is appropriate. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline imposed in the Order, and his original Complaint failed to state a claim. (See Order at 6–7.) Both the Court and the public benefit from the expeditious resolution of this action because further delay will impede judicial efficiency. See Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 642 (“fail[ing] to pursue the case for almost four months” favors dismissal). Additional delay will also prejudice Defendants, forcing them to spend needless resources on contesting this matter; in fact, Plaintiff has already delayed this action without explanation by failing to amend his Complaint. See Sw. Marine Inc. v. Danzig, 217 F.3d 1128, 1138 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Unreasonable delay is the foundation upon which a court may presume prejudice.”). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s action and DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case. The Court VACATES the hearing set for December 2, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 2 of 2 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk MG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?