Emmanuel Vargas v. Martin OMalley

Filing 18

JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, Related to: Order 17 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

Download PDF
1 E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney 2 DAVID M. HARRIS 3 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division 4 CEDINA M. KIM 5 Assistant United States Attorney Senior Litigation Counsel, Civil Division 6 MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969 7 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 8 Office of the General Counsel 9 Office of Program Litigation, Division 7 6401 Security Boulevard 10 Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: (510) 970-4830 11 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 12 E-mail: marla.letellier@ssa.gov 13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 18 EMMANUEL NICOLAS 19 VARGAS, 20 21 22 Plaintiff, v. 23 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 24 25 26 27 28 JS-6 Defendant. CASE NO. 5:24-cv-01368-AS [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF REMAND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. 8 9 10 DATED: November 25, 2024 11 / s / Sagar HONORABLE ALKA SAGAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 5:24-CV-01368-AS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?