Brandi Siebert v. Relish Labs LLC et al

Filing 11

(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff's and Defendants' Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/3/2025. [See document for further information.] (es)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No.
Title

5:24-cv-02508-SSS-SHKx

Date January 27, 2025

Brandi Siebert v. Relish Labs, LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable

SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Present

None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions
Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff’s and Defendants’
Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report
On December 5, 2024, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling
Conference for February 7, 2025 [Dkt. 8]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not
later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today’s date, the
parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, Perry G.
Smith and Danielle N. Riddles, and counsel for Defendants, Jessica Fortner Hahn,
to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for
their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Counsel are DIRECTED to
respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, February 3, 2025, at
12:00 noon. Counsel’s failure to respond—or counsel’s filing of an inadequate
response—may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1 of 1

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk iv