Agrovit Inc v. Dermasfalt, et al

Filing 137

RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT by Clerk, in favor of Agrovit Inc against Dermasfalt; in favor of Agrovit Inc against William W Stewart; in favor of Agrovit Inc against Amalia Vazquez; in favor of Agrovit Inc against Stewart & Barnett. Related to: Order 114 . (Attachments: # 1 ISSUED Notice of Renewal of Judgment (FOUO)) (jre)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Richard M. Hoefflin, Esq., SBN 061519
E-mail: [e-mail]
Jason M. Burrows, Esq., SBN 190159
E-mail: [e-mail]
HOEFFLIN · BURROWS,
A Law Corporation
2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 232
Westlake Village, CA 91361-2756
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Agrovit, Inc., a Delaware corporation

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Hoefflin · Burrows, A Law Corporation
2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 232
Westlake Village, California 91361
805-497-8605

(Southern Division)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

AGROVIT, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) Case No.: SA CV- 94-380 GLT (EEx)
)
[8:94-cv-380]
)
Plaintiff,
)
) RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK
vs.
) [124-127]
)
DERMASPHALT, INC., a Nevada
)
corporation;
)
WILLIAM STEWART, an individual;
)
AMALIA VAZQUEZ, an individual;
)
STEWART & BARNETT, a partnership; et)
al.
)
)
Defendants.
)

19
20
21
22

The Clerk of Court, having considered Plaintiff AGROVIT, INC.’s
(“AGROVIT”) [Proposed] Renewal of Judgment by Clerk:

23

Renewal of Judgment in favor of Plaintiff AGROVIT, INC. (“AGROVIT”) and against

24

Defendants DERMASPHALT, INC. (“DERMASPHALT”), WILLIAM STEWART

25

(“STEWART”), AMALIA VASQUEZ, also known as Amalia Del Toro (“VASQUEZ”), and

26

the Law Partnership of STEWART & BARNETT (“STEWART & BARNETT”), to be entered

27

as follows:

28

///
__________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK

1

1

1.

Title of Court and Number of Action (Code of Civ Proc. §683.140(a).)

2

The title of the Court where the original Judgment that is the subject of this application

3

for renewal is the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern

4

Division, 411 West Fourth Street, #1053, Santa Ana, California 92701-4516. The cause and

5

number of the action is SA CV 94-380 GLT (EEx) [8:94-cv-380].

6

2.

7

The date of entry of the Judgment that is the subject of this application is February 9,

8
9

Date of Entry/Renewals (Code of Civ Proc. §683.140(b).)

1996. There has been one previous renewal of said Judgment dated January 25, 2006.
3.

Addresses of Creditor and Debtors (Code of Civ Proc. §683.140(c).)

Hoefflin · Burrows, A Law Corporation
2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 232
Westlake Village, California 91361
805-497-8605

10

The address of the Judgment Creditor, Agrovit, Inc., is c/o Richard M. Hoefflin, Esq.,

11

Hoefflin · Burrows, A Law Corporation, 2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 232, Westlake Village,

12

CA 91361-2756. The last known addresses of the judgment debtors are as follows:

13

A.

Dermasphalt, Inc., 1502 North Broadway, Santa Ana, CA 92706

14

B.

William Stewart, 20271 SW Birch Street, #100, Newport Beach, CA
92660; 1912 N. Broadway, Santa Ana, CA 92706

15
C.

16

Amalia Vasquez, aka Amalia Del Toro, 2 Woodfall, Irvine, CA 92604;
31381 Coast Hwy., Laguna Beach, CA 92651-6989

17
D.

18

Law Partnership of Stewart & Barnett, c/o William Stewart, 20271 SW

19

Birch Street, #100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 ; 1912 N. Broadway,

20

Santa Ana, CA 92706

21

4.

No part of said Judgment has been paid to the Judgment Creditor, Agrovit, Inc.

22

5.

Information Necessary to Compute Judgment Amount (Code of Civ Proc.

23
24
25
26
27

§683.140(d).)
A.
For Dermasphalt, Inc.
Total First Renewal Judgment ..........................................
$2,162,170.82
Credits ...............................................................................
-0Interest after renewal judgment ($592.38 per day per
Schedule 1, times 3383 days)……………………… $2,004,021.54
Fee for filing renewal application (not requested) ............. -0Total Renewed Judgment ...............................................
$4,166,192.36

28
__________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Hoefflin · Burrows, A Law Corporation
2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 232
Westlake Village, California 91361
805-497-8605

10
11
12
13
14

B.
For William Stewart:
Total First Renewal Judgment ...........................................
Credits ................................................................................
Interest after renewal judgment ($592.38 per day per
Schedule 1, times 3383 days)……………………..
Fee for filing renewal application (not requested) ............
Total Renewed Judgment ...............................................
C.
For Amalia Vasquez:
Total First Renewal Judgment ...........................................
Credits ...............................................................................
Interest after renewal judgment ($589.16 per day per
Schedule 1, times 3383 days)……………………..
Fee for filing renewal application (not requested) ............
Total Renewed Judgment ...............................................

17

$2,004,021.54
-0$4,166,192.36

$2,150,430.82
-0$1,993,128.28
-0$4,143,559.10

D.
For Law Partnership of Stewart and Barnett:
Total First Renewal Judgment ...............................................
$54,113.00
Credits ....................................................................................
-0Interest after renewal judgment ($14.82 per day per Schedule 1,
times 3383 days)……………………………………..
$50,136.06
Fee for filing renewal application (not requested) ................ -0Total Renewed Judgment .................................................... $104,249.06

15
16

$2,162,170.82
-0-

CLERK OF COURT
Dated: 7/20/2016

s/ J. Remigio
Deputy Clerk

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK

3