Media Technologies v. Upper Deck Company, et al

Filing 1191

JUDGMENT by Chief Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler. Defendants motion for summary judgment that the patents in suit are invalid on obviousness grounds, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on defendants and counterclaimants affirmative defenses and counterclaims for declaratoryrelief that the claims of the patents in suit are invalid under Section 102 of the Patent Act, and defendants motion for summary judgment for non-infringement came regularly for hearing before the Court, the Honorable Alicemarie H. Stotler, Chief Judge, presiding. The matters having been duly heard and considered and rulings having been duly rendered, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that plaintiff takes nothing from defendants on the complaint, that judgment on the c ounterclaim for declaratory relief as to invalidity of the patents in suit on obviousness grounds is granted in favor of counterclaimants and against plaintiff/counterdefendant, the balance of the counterclaim isdismissed without prejudice, and each party shall bear its own costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (smi)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES LICENSING, LLC, a California limited liability company ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SA CV 01-1198 AHS (ANx) consolidated with SA CV 03-897 AHS (ANx)

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

Defendants' motion for summary judgment that the patents in suit are invalid on obviousness grounds, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on defendants' and counterclaimants' affirmative defenses and counterclaims for declaratory relief that the claims of the patents in suit are invalid under Section 102 of the Patent Act, and defendants' motion for summary judgment for non-infringement came regularly for hearing before the Court, the Honorable Alicemarie H. Stotler, Chief Judge, presiding. The matters having been duly heard and considered and

rulings having been duly rendered,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________ ALICEMARIE H. STOTLER CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that plaintiff takes nothing from defendants on the complaint, that judgment on the counterclaim for declaratory relief as to invalidity of the patents in suit on obviousness grounds is granted in favor of counterclaimants and against plaintiff/counterdefendant, the balance of the counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice, and each party shall bear its own costs of suit. DATED: October 6, 2008.

2