Todd and Bonnie Overturf et al v. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc et al

Filing 121

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford.The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Counterclaimant The Real Property Trust to show cause in writing no later than September 30, 2009 why the counterclaim should n ot be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: A proof of service of the summons and complaint on defendant(s); Papers see king entry of default or a default judgment; Answers or other filings by the defendant(s). NO oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (db)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title SACV 08-0365-AG(RNBx) Date September 18, 2009 TODD AND BONNIE OVERTURF, ET AL v ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC., ET AL Present: The Honorable ANDREW J. GUILFORD, U.S. District Judge Lisa Bredahl Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Counterclaimant The Real Property Trust to show cause in writing no later than September 30, 2009 why the counterclaim should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: · · · A proof of service of the summons and complaint on defendant(s); Papers seeking entry of default or a default judgment; Answers or other filings by the defendant(s). Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). And, if the action has not been diligently prosecuted, the Court may dismiss the action before the expiration of such time. Plaintiff(s) have the responsibility to respond promptly to orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time. Stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1. NO oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. : CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL 0 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title SACV 08-0365-AG(RNBx) Date September 18, 2009 TODD AND BONNIE OVERTURF, ET AL v ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC., ET AL Initials of Preparer lmb CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?