Entrepreneur Media Inc v. Eygn Limited Ernst & Young LLP et al
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter granting re Stipulation for Extending Time to File and Serve Response to Counterclaims 19 . The time for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc. to file and serve a responsive pleading to the counterclaims filed in this action shall be extended from 09/18/08 to 09/25/08. (db)
1 Jeffrey R. Patterson, Esq. (State Bar No. 126148)
Michael R. Adele, Esq. (State Bar No. 138339)
2 Michael J. Holmes, Esq. (State Bar No. 199311)
Cheryl A. Withycombe, Esq. (State Bar No. 237475)
3
4 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
12348 High Bluff Drive, Suite 210
5 San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 481-5055
6 Facsimile: (858) 481-5028
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8 ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.,
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
EYGN LIMITED; ERNST & YOUNG LLP;)
and ERNST & YOUNG ADVISORY INC., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
No. SACV08-0608 DOC (MLGx)
Complaint filed June 2, 2008
ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO FILE AND SERVE
RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS
Local Rule 8-3
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
1
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
704811.01/SD
] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS
ORDER
1
2
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN it is hereby ordered that the time for Plaintiff/Counter-
3 defendant ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC. to file and serve a responsive pleading to the
4 counterclaims filed in this action shall be extended from September 18, 2008 to September 25,
5 2008.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8 Dated: September 19, 2008
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
-2-
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
704811.01/SD
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?