Entrepreneur Media Inc v. Eygn Limited Ernst & Young LLP et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter granting re Stipulation for Extending Time to File and Serve Response to Counterclaims 19 . The time for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc. to file and serve a responsive pleading to the counterclaims filed in this action shall be extended from 09/18/08 to 09/25/08. (db)

Download PDF
1 Jeffrey R. Patterson, Esq. (State Bar No. 126148) Michael R. Adele, Esq. (State Bar No. 138339) 2 Michael J. Holmes, Esq. (State Bar No. 199311) Cheryl A. Withycombe, Esq. (State Bar No. 237475) 3 4 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 12348 High Bluff Drive, Suite 210 5 San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 481-5055 6 Facsimile: (858) 481-5028 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) EYGN LIMITED; ERNST & YOUNG LLP;) and ERNST & YOUNG ADVISORY INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. SACV08-0608 DOC (MLGx) Complaint filed June 2, 2008 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS Local Rule 8-3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES 1 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 704811.01/SD ] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS ORDER 1 2 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN it is hereby ordered that the time for Plaintiff/Counter- 3 defendant ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC. to file and serve a responsive pleading to the 4 counterclaims filed in this action shall be extended from September 18, 2008 to September 25, 5 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: September 19, 2008 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES -2- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 704811.01/SD [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?