Ceiva Logic Inc v. Frame Media Inc et al

Filing 179

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT FRAME MEDIA, INC by Judge James V. Selna: The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Frame Media, Inc. and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over Frame Media. (see document for details) (mu)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SANTA ANA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

CEIVA LOGIC, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

Case No. SACV-08-636-JVS (RNBx)

Plaintiff and Counterclaimdefendant,

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA
LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT
FRAME MEDIA, INC.

v.
FRAME MEDIA, INC., a
Delaware corporation; DIGITAL
SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,
a California corporation and DOES
1-10, inclusive,

HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA,
PRESIDING

Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST FRAME MEDIA, INC.

1

The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Frame Media, Inc.

2

(“Frame Media”) and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS

3

HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

4

1. This Court has jurisdiction over Frame Media.

5

2. This Court has subject matter of this action brought by Plaintiff, Ceiva Logic,

6
7

Inc. (“Ceiva”).
3. Ceiva is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to United States

8

Patent No. 6,442,573 (“the ‘573 patent”), including all rights of recovery for

9

infringement thereof.

10

4. Frame Media has infringed the ‘573 patent.

11

5. Ceiva has been irreparably damaged by the actions of Frame Media and will

12

continue to be irreparably damaged by the actions of the Frame Media unless

13

Frame Media is permanently enjoined by this Court from infringement of the

14

‘573 patent.

15

6. Frame Media, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, receivers,

16

trustees and other fiduciaries and all other persons in active participation with

17

them are, therefore, permanently enjoined during the life of the ‘573 patent

18

from any and all acts of infringement of the ‘573 patent, including, but not

19

limited to, making, having made, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing

20

into the United States the invention claimed in the ‘573 patent.

21

7. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, this is an “exceptional case”, and Ceiva is awarded

22

its reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount to be determined by this Court at

23

the time Ceiva’s request for fees is considered.

24

8. Pursuant to FRCP 54(d)(1), Ceiva is awarded costs of suit in an amount to be

25

fixed by the Court.

26

[continued on next page]

27
28

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST FRAME MEDIA, INC.

1
2

9. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of this
Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6
7

Dated: January 05, 2015

___________________________________
Hon. James V. Selna

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST FRAME MEDIA, INC.