Ceiva Logic Inc v. Frame Media Inc et al

Filing 180

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC by Judge James V. Selna: The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc. and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over DSS. (see document for details) (mu)

1
2
3
4
5

JS-6

6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SANTA ANA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

CEIVA LOGIC, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

Case No. SACV-08-636-JVS (RNBx)

Plaintiff and Counterclaimdefendant,

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF CEIVA
LOGIC, INC. AGAINST DEFENDANT
DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS,
INC.

v.
FRAME MEDIA, INC., a
Delaware corporation; DIGITAL
SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,
a California corporation and DOES
1-10, inclusive,

HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA,
PRESIDING

Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST
DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC

1

The Court having previously entered default against Defendant Digital Spectrum

2

Solutions, Inc. (“DSS”) and upon proof made to the satisfaction of this Court, IT IS

3

HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

4

1. This Court has jurisdiction over DSS.

5

2. This Court has subject matter of this action brought by Plaintiff, Ceiva Logic,

6
7

Inc. (“Ceiva”).
3. Ceiva is the owner of the entire right, title and interest in and to United States

8

Patent No. 6,442,573 (“the ‘573 patent”), including all rights of recovery for

9

infringement thereof.

10

4. DSS has infringed the ‘573 patent.

11

5. Ceiva has been irreparably damaged by the actions of DSS and will continue to

12

be irreparably damaged by the actions of the DSS unless DSS is permanently

13

enjoined by this Court from infringement of the ‘573 patent.

14

6. DSS, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, receivers, trustees

15

and other fiduciaries and all other persons in active participation with them are,

16

therefore, permanently enjoined during the life of the ‘573 patent from any and

17

all acts of infringement of the ‘573 patent, including, but not limited to, making,

18

having made, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing into the United

19

States the invention claimed in the ‘573 patent.

20

7. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, this is an “exceptional case”, and Ceiva is awarded

21

its reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount to be determined by this Court at

22

the time Ceiva’s request for fees is considered.

23

8. Pursuant to FRCP 54(d)(1), Ceiva is awarded costs of suit in an amount to be

24

fixed by the Court.

25

[continued on next page]

26
27
28

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST
DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC

1
2

9. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of this
Judgment.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7
8

Dated: January 05, 2015

___________________________________
Hon. James V. Selna

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST
DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC