Joanne Gaines et al v. Home Loan Center Inc et al

Filing 185

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Joanne Gaines shall take nothing by her Second Amended Complaint and that JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Defendants. Defendants are the prevailing parties and shall be entitled to costs of suit herein 63 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

11
12 JOANNE GAINES and JOHNNIE

CAVE, on behalf of themselves and all
13 others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

14

Case No. SACV08-667 JST (RNBx)
The Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
JUDGMENT

v.

15

16 HOME LOAN CENTER INC. d/b/a

LENDINGTREE LOANS;

17 LENDINGTREE, LLC; and DOES 1

through 10,

18

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

not

Complaint Filed: June 13, 2008

1

On Monday, December 5, 2011, the Motions for Summary Judgment

2 or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment of defendants Home Loan Center,
3 Inc. and LendingTree, LLC (collectively "Defendants") came on for hearing, the
4 Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker, District Judge presiding. Defendants appeared
5 by and through Aaron J. Malo and Isaiah Z. Weedn of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
6 Hampton LLP. Plaintiff appeared by and through Michael R. Reese of Reese
7 Richman LLP and Deborah Clark-Weintraub of Whatley Drake & Kallas LLC. The
8 evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard,
9 and a decision having been duly rendered as reflected in the following orders:
10

(a)

Doc. 177, the Order Granting (1) Defendant Home Loan Center,

11 Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 112) and (2) Defendant LendingTree,
12 LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 113); and
13

(b)

Doc. 181, the Order (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for

14 Reconsideration (Doc. 178) and (2) Vacating All Future Hearing Dates;
15

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Joanne

16 Gaines shall take nothing by her Second Amended Complaint and that JUDGMENT
17 IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Defendants. Defendants are the prevailing
18 parties and shall be entitled to costs of suit herein.
19
20
21 Dated: February 07, 2012

________________________________

22

HON. JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-