Joanne Gaines et al v. Home Loan Center Inc et al

Filing 206

AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, in favor of Home Loan Center Inc, Lending Tree LLC, Lending Tree Loans against Joanne Gaines Related to: Order on Motion for Taxation of Costs 201 . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plainti ff Joanne Gaines shall take nothing by her Second Amended Complaint and that JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Defendants. Defendants are the prevailing parties and shall be entitled to costs in the amount of $5,292.92 against Plaintiff. (rla)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

11
12 JOANNE GAINES and JOHNNIE

CAVE, on behalf of themselves and all
13 others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case No. SACV08-667 JST (RNBx)

AMENDED JUDGMENT

v.

16 HOME LOAN CENTER INC. d/b/a

LENDINGTREE LOANS;

17 LENDINGTREE, LLC; and DOES 1

through 10,

18

Defendants.

19
20
21

On Monday, December 5, 2011, the Motions for Summary Judgment

22 or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment of defendants Home Loan Center,
23 Inc. and LendingTree, LLC (collectively "Defendants") came on for hearing, the
24 Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker, District Judge presiding. Defendants appeared
25 by and through Aaron J. Malo and Isaiah Z. Weedn of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
26 Hampton LLP. Plaintiff appeared by and through Michael R. Reese of Reese
27 Richman LLP and Deborah Clark-Weintraub of Whatley Drake & Kallas LLC. The
28
-1-

AMENDED JUDGMENT

1 evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard,
2 and a decision having been duly rendered as reflected in the following orders:
3

(a)

Doc. 177, the Order Granting (1) Defendant Home Loan Center,

4 Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 112) and (2) Defendant LendingTree,
5 LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 113); and
6

(b)

Doc. 181, the Order (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion for

7 Reconsideration (Doc. 178) and (2) Vacating All Future Hearing Dates.
8

In addition, on Thursday, June 28, 2012, the Court, having received,

9 reviewed, and fully considered the briefs and evidence presented by the parties in
10 support of and in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Retax Costs (including all
11 materials filed in support of and in opposition to Defendants' Application to the
12 Clerk to Tax Costs), granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motion to Retax
13 Costs as reflected in Doc. 201, the Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part
14 Defendants' Motion To Retax Costs (Doc. 197).
15

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Joanne

16 Gaines shall take nothing by her Second Amended Complaint and that JUDGMENT
17 IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Defendants. Defendants are the prevailing
18 parties and shall be entitled to costs in the amount of $5,292.92 against Plaintiff.
19
20
21 Dated: _August 28, 2012_

________________________________

22

HON. JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

AMENDED JUDGMENT