Hilda L. Solis v. Best Miracle Corporation et al
Filing
205
IN CHAMBERS MINUTE ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT 203 by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court hereby orders Defendants to show cause why they should not be held in contempt. The hearing on the order to show cause is scheduled for December 6, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. (see document for details) (mu)
Hilda L. Solis v. Best Miracle Corporation et al
Doc. 205
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL Case No. SACV 08-00998-CJC (MLGx) Date: October 25, 2010
Title: HILDA L. SOLIS V. BEST MIRACLE CORPORATION, THUY THI LE, AND TOAN VAN NGUYEN
PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Michelle Urie Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
N/A Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present
None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT [filed 10/15/10] The Court has reviewed the Secretary of Labor's petition to hold Defendants Best Miracle Corporation, Thuy Thi Le and Toan Van Nguyen in civil contempt for their failure to comply with the amended permanent injunction this Court issued on July 8, 2010. Based on evidence presented by the Secretary that Defendants have not paid the $186,559.83 in back wages they owe for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act or offered evidence that they are unable to pay, the Court hereby orders Defendants to show cause why they should not be held in contempt. Defendants shall file their opposition to this order to show cause by November 12, 2010, and the Secretary shall filed her response thereto by November 29, 2010. The hearing on the order to show cause is scheduled for December 6, 2010 at 1:30 p.m.
mkyc MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk MU
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?