Thomas Rizzo et al v. Nutmeg Insurance Company et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna in favor of Nutmeg Insurance Company against Barbara Rizzo, Thomas Rizzo Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Motion Hearing,,, 42 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (db)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No.: SACV 08-1016-JVS (RNBx) ) ) ) JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) NUTMEG INSURANCE COMPANY; ) ) Does 1-25, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) THOMAS RIZZO and BARBARA RIZZO, TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to the Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Nutmeg Insurance Company, as more fully set forth in the Court's Minutes of June 29, 2009, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Nutmeg Insurance Company against Plaintiffs Thomas Rizzo and Barbara Rizzo. The Rizzos shall take nothing by their complaint. 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Nutmeg, as the prevailing party, shall recover its taxable costs of suit in this matter as taxed by the Clerk under the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. The sums awarded by this Court as costs shall bear postjudgment interest at the current U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate, from the date this judgment is entered until it is paid. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 17, 2009_____________ ____________________________ By: James V. Selna United States District Judge 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?