Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al

Filing 114

ORDER by Judge James V. Selna granting APPLICATION for attorney Cindy P. Abramson to Appear Pro Hac Vice 108 on behalf of Plaintiffs Don Henley, Mike Campbell and Danny Kortchmar, designating Charles E. Patterson as local counsel. (PHV FEE PAID.) (dro)

Download PDF
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al Doc. 114 Charles E. Patterson (CA SBN 120081) CPATTERSON@MOFO.COM Morrison & Foerster LLP 555 W. Fifth Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1024 Telephone: 213-892-5553 Facsimile: 213-892-5454 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Don Henley, Mike Campbell and Danny Korchmar UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DON HENLEY, MIKE CAMPBELL, and DANNY KORTCHMAR, Plaintiff(s) CASE NUMBER SACV09-0481 JVS (RNBx) v. CHARLES S. DEVORE and JUSTIN HART, Defendant(s). ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE The Court, having reviewed the accompanying Application of Cindy P. Abramson Applicant's Name of Morrison & Foerster LLP, 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104-0050 Firm Name /Address 212.468.8000 Telephone Number cabramson@mofo.com E-mail Address for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of Don Henley, Mike Campbell, and Danny Kortchmar and the designation of Charles E. Patterson/SBN 120081 Local Counsel Designee /State Bar Number Plaintiff Defendant of Morrison & Foerster LLP, 555 West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013-1024 Local Counsel Firm / Address 213.892.5200 Telephone Number cpatterson@mofo.com E-mail Address as local counsel, hereby ORDERS the Application be:X GRANTED DENIED. Fee, if paid, shall be returned by the Clerk. Dated July 13, 2010 U. S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge G-64 ORDER (01/08) la-1082323 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?