Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al

Filing 116

ORDER by Judge James V. Selna Extending Time to Reopen Case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties have the right, upon good cause being shown within ninety (90) days, to reopen the action if settlement is not finalized and the full settlement amount is not paid. (db)

Download PDF
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al Doc. 116 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH (pro hac vice) JCharlesworth@mofo.com CRAIG B. WHITNEY (CA SBN 217673) CWhitney@mofo.com 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900 PAUL GOLDSTEIN (CA SBN 79613) PGoldstein@mofo.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: 650.723.0313 Facsimile: 650.327.0811 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ONE LLP CHRISTOPHER W. ARLEDGE (CA SBN 200767) CArledge@onellp.com JOHN TEHRANIAN (CA SBN 211616) JTehranian@onellp.com 4000 MacArthur Blvd. West Tower, Suite 1100 Newport Beach, California 92660 Telephone: 949.502.2870 Facsimile: 949.258.5081 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DON HENLEY, MIKE CAMPBELL and DANNY KORTCHMAR, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES S. DEVORE and JUSTIN HART, Defendants. Case No. SACV09-0481 JVS (RNBx) Hon. James V. Selna ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO REOPEN CASE ny-932418 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties have the right, upon good cause being shown within ninety (90) days, to reopen the action if settlement is not finalized and the full settlement amount is not paid. Dated: July 16, 2010 Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 1 ny-932418

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?